117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35381784)
21. Three-dimensional personalized Monte Carlo dosimetry in 90Y resin microspheres therapy of hepatic metastases: nontumoral liver and lungs radiation protection considerations and treatment planning optimization.
Petitguillaume A; Bernardini M; Hadid L; de Labriolle-Vaylet C; Franck D; Desbrée A
J Nucl Med; 2014 Mar; 55(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 24504053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of 67Ga production using the Monte Carlo code MCNPX.
Sadeghi M; Jokar N; Kakavand T; Ghafoori Fard H; Tenreiro C
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Jul; 77():14-7. PubMed ID: 23500652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo dosimetry of CSA1 and CSA2 137Cs brachytherapy source models.
Selvam TP; Sahoo S; Vishwakarma RS
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3870-9. PubMed ID: 19810459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of electron dose-point kernels in water generated by the Monte Carlo codes, PENELOPE, GEANT4, MCNPX, and ETRAN.
Uusijärvi H; Chouin N; Bernhardt P; Ferrer L; Bardiès M; Forssell-Aronsson E
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2009 Aug; 24(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 19694581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of respiratory motion on internal radiation dosimetry.
Xie T; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112506. PubMed ID: 25370665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improved non-destructive method for
Samardžić S; Milošević M; Todorović N; Lakatoš R
Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Jul; 137():199-204. PubMed ID: 29655125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of I-131 radioimmunotherapy tumor dosimetry: unit density sphere model versus patient-specific Monte Carlo calculations.
Howard DM; Kearfott KJ; Wilderman SJ; Dewaraja YK
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2011 Oct; 26(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 21939358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low-coupled parallel strategy for Monte Carlo radiation dose calculation.
Massa JM; Doorn JH; Wainschenker RS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():1771-4. PubMed ID: 21096418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative analysis of 11 different radioisotopes for palliative treatment of bone metastases by computational methods.
Guerra Liberal FD; Tavares AA; Tavares JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114101. PubMed ID: 25370676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluating the Application of Tissue-Specific Dose Kernels Instead of Water Dose Kernels in Internal Dosimetry: A Monte Carlo Study.
Khazaee Moghadam M; Kamali Asl A; Geramifar P; Zaidi H
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2016 Dec; 31(10):367-379. PubMed ID: 27996311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of S values for I
Sinha A; Singh N; Dixit BM; Painuly NK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(6):1298-1302. PubMed ID: 30488847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Monte-Carlo method for interface dosimetry of beta emitters.
Buffa FM; Verhaegen F; Flux GD; Dearnaley DP
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2003 Jun; 18(3):463-71. PubMed ID: 12954134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monte Carlo calculations of absorbed doses in tumours using a modified MOBY mouse phantom for pre-clinical dosimetry studies.
Larsson E; Ljungberg M; Strand SE; Jönsson BA
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):973-80. PubMed ID: 21767199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An experimental and Monte Carlo investigation of the energy dependence of alanine/EPR dosimetry: I. Clinical x-ray beams.
Zeng GG; McEwen MR; Rogers DW; Klassen NV
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 15083670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions.
Titt U; Sahoo N; Ding X; Zheng Y; Newhauser WD; Zhu XR; Polf JC; Gillin MT; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4455-70. PubMed ID: 18670050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fine-resolution voxel S values for constructing absorbed dose distributions at variable voxel size.
Dieudonné A; Hobbs RF; Bolch WE; Sgouros G; Gardin I
J Nucl Med; 2010 Oct; 51(10):1600-7. PubMed ID: 20847175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monte Carlo simulation of trabecular bone remodelling and absorbed dose coefficients for tritium and 14C.
Richardson RB; Nie HL; Chettle DR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):158-62. PubMed ID: 17652111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analytical functions for beta and gamma absorbed fractions of iodine-131 in spherical and ellipsoidal volumes.
Mowlavi AA; Fornasier MR; Mirzaei M; Bregant P; de Denaro M
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Oct; 28(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 24777651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
