177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35382744)
1. Investigating treatment-effect modification by a continuous covariate in IPD meta-analysis: an approach using fractional polynomials.
Sauerbrei W; Royston P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35382744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP in patients requiring mechanical ventilation--protocol of the ICEM study.
Kasenda B; Sauerbrei W; Royston P; Briel M
Syst Rev; 2014 May; 3():46. PubMed ID: 24887172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-STEPP: subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot for individual patient data meta-analysis.
Wang XV; Cole B; Bonetti M; Gelber RD
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3704-16. PubMed ID: 27073066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials.
Royston P; Sauerbrei W
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2509-25. PubMed ID: 15287081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-STEPP with random effects.
Wang XV; Cole B; Bonetti M; Gelber RD
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):312-317. PubMed ID: 29281174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers.
Haller B; Ulm K; Hapfelmeier A
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():7037230. PubMed ID: 31312252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis for continuous, binary, and count outcomes.
Yip WK; Bonetti M; Cole BF; Barcella W; Wang XV; Lazar A; Gelber RD
Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 27094489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.
Ensor J; Burke DL; Snell KIE; Hemming K; Riley RD
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 29776399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multivariable fractional polynomial interaction to investigate continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP for patients with ARDS.
Kasenda B; Sauerbrei W; Royston P; Mercat A; Slutsky AS; Cook D; Guyatt GH; Brochard L; Richard JC; Stewart TE; Meade M; Briel M
BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e011148. PubMed ID: 27609843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaction of treatment with a continuous variable: simulation study of power for several methods of analysis.
Royston P; Sauerbrei W
Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(27):4695-708. PubMed ID: 25244679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data.
Tudur Smith C; Marcucci M; Nolan SJ; Iorio A; Sudell M; Riley R; Rovers MM; Williamson PR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):MR000007. PubMed ID: 27595791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of multiple covariates in assessing treatment-effect modifiers: A methodological review of individual participant data meta-analyses.
Godolphin PJ; Marlin N; Cornett C; Fisher DJ; Tierney JF; White IR; Rogozińska E
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 37771175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying treatment effect heterogeneity in clinical trials using subpopulations of events: STEPP.
Lazar AA; Bonetti M; Cole BF; Yip WK; Gelber RD
Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 26493094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Fisher D; Hattle M; Marlin N; Hoogland J; Gueyffier F; Staessen JA; Wang J; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB; Ensor J
Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2115-2137. PubMed ID: 32350891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?
Bordewijk EM; Wang R; van Wely M; Costello MF; Norman RJ; Teede H; Gurrin LC; Mol BW; Li W
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Nov; 26(6):929-941. PubMed ID: 32935841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new strategy for meta-analysis of continuous covariates in observational studies.
Sauerbrei W; Royston P
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3341-60. PubMed ID: 21953493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment-covariate interaction with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Hattle M; Whittle R; Ensor J
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):718-730. PubMed ID: 37386750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
