These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35383905)

  • 41. Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
    Rubin M; Badea C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17178928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Partisan-motivated sampling: Re-examining politically motivated reasoning across the information processing stream.
    Derreumaux Y; Bergh R; Hughes BL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):316-336. PubMed ID: 35420863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Eye contact perception in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder.
    Uono S; Yoshimura S; Toichi M
    Autism; 2021 Jan; 25(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 32847375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Meta-humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross-group interaction.
    Borinca I; Tropp LR; Ofosu N
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2021 Jul; 60(3):1051-1074. PubMed ID: 33644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Being "in" with the in-crowd: the effects of social exclusion and inclusion are enhanced by the perceived essentialism of ingroups and outgroups.
    Bernstein MJ; Sacco DF; Young SG; Hugenberg K; Cook E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Aug; 36(8):999-1009. PubMed ID: 20693384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Not so black and white: memory for ambiguous group members.
    Pauker K; Weisbuch M; Ambady N; Sommers SR; Adams RB; Ivcevic Z
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 96(4):795-810. PubMed ID: 19309203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain.
    Lin LC; Qu Y; Telzer EH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(42):10630-10635. PubMed ID: 30282742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Introducing the Sociopolitical Motive × Intergroup Threat Model to Understand How Monoracial Perceivers' Sociopolitical Motives Influence Their Categorization of Multiracial People.
    Ho AK; Kteily NS; Chen JM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2020 Aug; 24(3):260-286. PubMed ID: 32449637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Toward a New Approach to Cross-Cultural Distinctiveness and Typicality of Human Faces: The Cross-Group Typicality/ Distinctiveness Metric.
    Kleisner K; Pokorný Š; Saribay SA
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():124. PubMed ID: 30766504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Group norms, intergroup resource allocation, and social reasoning among children and adolescents.
    McGuire L; Manstead ASR; Rutland A
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Dec; 53(12):2333-2339. PubMed ID: 28933878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An ingroup disadvantage in recognizing micro-expressions.
    Wu Q; Peng K; Xie Y; Lai Y; Liu X; Zhao Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1050068. PubMed ID: 36507018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interracial contact differentially shapes brain networks involved in social and non-social judgments from faces: a combination of univariate and multivariate approaches.
    Handley G; Kubota J; Cloutier J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 17(2):218-230. PubMed ID: 34273899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perceiving mixed valence emotions reduces intergroup dehumanisation.
    Prati F; Giner-Sorolla R
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1018-1031. PubMed ID: 28952398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games.
    Shore DM; Rychlowska M; van der Schalk J; Parkinson B; Manstead ASR
    Emotion; 2019 Jun; 19(4):605-616. PubMed ID: 29963884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is social categorization based on relational ingroup/outgroup opposition? A meta-analysis.
    Shkurko AV
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 8(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 22847948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do they feel the same as us? The infrahumanization of individuals with Down syndrome.
    Betancor Rodríguez V; Ariño Mateo E; Rodríguez-Pérez A; Delgado Rodríguez N
    Psicothema; 2016 Aug; 28(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 27448266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Positivity bias in judging ingroup members' emotional expressions.
    Lazerus T; Ingbretsen ZA; Stolier RM; Freeman JB; Cikara M
    Emotion; 2016 Dec; 16(8):1117-1125. PubMed ID: 27775407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Rapid saccadic categorization of other-race faces.
    de Lissa P; Sokhn N; Lasrado S; Tanaka K; Watanabe K; Caldara R
    J Vis; 2021 Nov; 21(12):1. PubMed ID: 34724530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The consequences of outgroup helping: Children's and adolescents' reasoning.
    Hitti A; Mulvey KL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Mar; 203():105013. PubMed ID: 33221661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does Cross-Race Contact Improve Cross-Race Face Perception? A Meta-Analysis of the Cross-Race Deficit and Contact.
    Singh B; Mellinger C; Earls HA; Tran J; Bardsley B; Correll J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Jun; 48(6):865-887. PubMed ID: 34176344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.