These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Endodontic posts and cores. Part II. Design of the Flexi-post. Musikant BL; Deutsch AS J Ala Dent Assoc; 1985; 69(4):42-6. PubMed ID: 3912420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a solid post and core. Mosen PJ; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ J Endod; 1984 Mar; 10(3):91-5. PubMed ID: 6371177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a custom hollow post and core. Halle EB; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ J Endod; 1984 Mar; 10(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 6371178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of the retentive strength of 6 root posts]. Charpentier J Cah Prothese; 1983 Sep; 11(43):29-38. PubMed ID: 6380661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Retention and stress-distributing characteristics of the Protector root canal post]. Caputo AA; Hokama SN Odontostomatol Proodos; 1986 Oct; 40(5):243-8. PubMed ID: 3131701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A hollow post and core system--evaluation of reinstrumentation and reobturation. Ludington JR; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ J Endod; 1984 Apr; 10(4):140-5. PubMed ID: 6374006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of Heli-Coil, cemented, and threaded posts: a comparison. Bowles WH; Thompson LR Gen Dent; 1983; 31(5):374-5. PubMed ID: 6368312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of crimping on the retention of hollow posts. Hertl NH; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ J Endod; 1984 Apr; 10(4):135-9. PubMed ID: 6374005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of various technics used in the reconstruction of dowels]. Pamplona Guisa JM; Ramirez Delgado RH Odontol Mexico; 1983 May; 1(2):7-17. PubMed ID: 6382087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prefabricated root canal posts]. Orstavik D; Holland RI Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1986 Sep; 96(12):521-4. PubMed ID: 3543836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The ideal endodontic posts. A review of the literature]. Doornbusch H; Vissink A; Huysmans MC Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Mar; 110(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 12680341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. Plasmans PJ; Visseren LG; Vrijhoef MM; Kayser AF J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):382-7. PubMed ID: 3531376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of the type of cement on retention of root posts]. Francois M Cah Prothese; 1980 Apr; 8(30):79-90. PubMed ID: 7011492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preparation of the tooth for a root post. Root posts]. Weiszfeld A Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1982; 36(140):499-540. PubMed ID: 6763467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]