These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35386221)

  • 41. Development of a read-across-derived classification model for the predictions of mutagenicity data and its comparison with traditional QSAR models and expert systems.
    Pandey SK; Roy K
    Toxicology; 2023 Dec; 500():153676. PubMed ID: 37993082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Computational prediction of the metabolites of agrochemicals formed in rats.
    Scholz VA; Stork C; Frericks M; Kirchmair J
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Oct; 895():165039. PubMed ID: 37355108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Refine and Strengthen SAR-Based Read-Across by Considering Bioactivation and Modes of Action.
    Yan G; Rose J; Ellison C; Mudd AM; Zhang X; Wu S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1532-1548. PubMed ID: 37594911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.
    Beal MA; Gagne M; Kulkarni SA; Patlewicz G; Thomas RS; Barton-Maclaren TS
    ALTEX; 2022; 39(1):123-139. PubMed ID: 34818430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The OECD QSAR Toolbox Starts Its Second Decade.
    Schultz TW; Diderich R; Kuseva CD; Mekenyan OG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():55-77. PubMed ID: 29934887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clustering a Chemical Inventory for Safety Assessment of Fragrance Ingredients: Identifying Read-Across Analogs to Address Data Gaps.
    Date MS; O'Brien D; Botelho DJ; Schultz TW; Liebler DC; Penning TM; Salvito DT
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2020 Jul; 33(7):1709-1718. PubMed ID: 32338872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An evaluation of the performance of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting acute oral toxicity.
    Nelms MD; Karmaus AL; Patlewicz G
    Comput Toxicol; 2020 Nov; 16():. PubMed ID: 33163737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Identifying xenobiotic metabolites with
    Boyce M; Favela KA; Bonzo JA; Chao A; Lizarraga LE; Moody LR; Owens EO; Patlewicz G; Shah I; Sobus JR; Thomas RS; Williams AJ; Yau A; Wambaugh JF
    Front Toxicol; 2023; 5():1051483. PubMed ID: 36742129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment.
    Kavlock RJ; Bahadori T; Barton-Maclaren TS; Gwinn MR; Rasenberg M; Thomas RS
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2018 May; 31(5):287-290. PubMed ID: 29600706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the use of in silico tools for prioritising toxicity testing of the low-volume industrial chemicals in REACH.
    Rybacka A; Rudén C; Andersson PL
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 115(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 24428755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Integration of read-across and artificial neural network-based QSAR models for predicting systemic toxicity: A case study for valproic acid.
    Hisaki T; Kaneko MAN; Hirota M; Matsuoka M; Kouzuki H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2020; 45(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 32062621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing in vivo data and in silico predictions for acute effects assessment of biocidal active substances and metabolites for aquatic organisms.
    Blázquez M; Andreu-Sánchez O; Ranero I; Fernández-Cruz ML; Benfenati E
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Dec; 205():111291. PubMed ID: 32956865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Good, The Bad, and The Perplexing: Structural Alerts and Read-Across for Predicting Skin Sensitization Using Human Data.
    Golden E; Ukaegbu DC; Ranslow P; Brown RH; Hartung T; Maertens A
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 May; 36(5):734-746. PubMed ID: 37126467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An ensemble model of QSAR tools for regulatory risk assessment.
    Pradeep P; Povinelli RJ; White S; Merrill SJ
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():48. PubMed ID: 28316646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Read-across and new approach methodologies applied in a 10-step framework for cosmetics safety assessment - A case study with parabens.
    Ouedraogo G; Alexander-White C; Bury D; Clewell HJ; Cronin M; Cull T; Dent M; Desprez B; Detroyer A; Ellison C; Giammanco S; Hack E; Hewitt NJ; Kenna G; Klaric M; Kreiling R; Lester C; Mahony C; Mombelli E; Naciff J; O'Brien J; Schepky A; Tozer S; van der Burg B; van Vugt-Lussenburg B; Stuard S; Cosmetics Europe
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jul; 132():105161. PubMed ID: 35508214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Read-across can increase confidence in the Next Generation Risk Assessment for skin sensitisation: A case study with resorcinol.
    Gautier F; Tourneix F; Assaf Vandecasteele H; van Vliet E; Bury D; Alépée N
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Nov; 117():104755. PubMed ID: 32800849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing.
    Wetmore BA; Wambaugh JF; Allen B; Ferguson SS; Sochaski MA; Setzer RW; Houck KA; Strope CL; Cantwell K; Judson RS; LeCluyse E; Clewell HJ; Thomas RS; Andersen ME
    Toxicol Sci; 2015 Nov; 148(1):121-36. PubMed ID: 26251325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the global performance of eight in silico skin sensitization models using human data.
    Golden E; Macmillan DS; Dameron G; Kern P; Hartung T; Maertens A
    ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 32388570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.
    Guo Y; Zhao L; Zhang X; Zhu H
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Aug; 178():178-187. PubMed ID: 31004930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Automated read-across workflow for predicting acute oral toxicity: I. The decision scheme in the QSAR toolbox.
    Kutsarova S; Mehmed A; Cherkezova D; Stoeva S; Georgiev M; Petkov T; Chapkanov A; Schultz TW; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105015. PubMed ID: 34293429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.