193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35386808)
1. Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications.
Mranda GM; Xue Y; Zhou XG; Yu W; Wei T; Xiang ZP; Liu JJ; Ding YL
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2022 Mar; 75():103411. PubMed ID: 35386808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database.
Yang F; Zhong Q; Huang Z; Lian M; Fang J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():10. PubMed ID: 30733707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration the biologic factors into the staging of breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis.
Lian CL; Cai XY; Zhou P; Wang J; Chen XB; Wu SG
J Cancer; 2020; 11(23):6834-6840. PubMed ID: 33123274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The applicability of new TNM classification for humanpapilloma virus-related oropharyngeal cancer in the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system in Japan: A single-centre study.
Sano D; Yabuki K; Arai Y; Tanabe T; Chiba Y; Nishimura G; Takahashi H; Yamanaka S; Oridate N
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 28760331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system in terms of predicting recurrence and survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Nam SH; Bae MR; Roh JL; Gong G; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2018 Dec; 87():158-164. PubMed ID: 30527232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic impact of the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system on clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) breast cancer patients.
Lombardi A; Vitale V; Nigri G; Olivieri C; Mastrangeli MR; Bizzaglia E; Amanti C
Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1265-1269. PubMed ID: 32180300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Development trend of assessment system in gastric cancer based on evolution of staging criteria].
Sun L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 30370509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage system for gastric cancer patients: a population-based analysis.
He X; Wu W; Lin Z; Ding Y; Si J; Sun LM
Gastric Cancer; 2018 May; 21(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 29052053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.
Jiang W; Zhao B; Li Y; Qi D; Wang D
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1129. PubMed ID: 33225924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic nomograms combining N classification with ratio-based nodal classifications to predict long-term survival for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: a SEER population-based study.
Wang S; Yu Y; Xu W; Lv X; Zhang Y; Liu M
BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):653. PubMed ID: 34344326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems.
Yang M; Zhang Y; Zeng L; Ke NW; Tan CL; Tian BL; Xiang B; Liu XB
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 30661921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified ypTNM Staging Classification for Gastric Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Zhong Q; Chen QY; Parisi A; Ma YB; Lin GT; Desiderio J; Yan S; Xie JW; Wang JB; Hou JF; Lin JX; Lu J; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Liu ZY; Que SJ; Li P; Zheng CH; Huang CM
Oncologist; 2021 Jan; 26(1):e99-e110. PubMed ID: 32864840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A better prognostic stratification for the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system of gastric cancer by incorporating pT4aN0M0 into stage IIIA.
Chen Y; Zhang G; Zhao B; Huang C; Ling Y; Li Y; Zhou Z
Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 29():90-96. PubMed ID: 31196500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for Japanese patients treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Tang L; Ishikawa Y; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Aug; 25(8):1499-1505. PubMed ID: 32356049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Differences in Survival Rates between the 7th and 8th Editions of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Single-Institution Study of 5,507 Patients in Korea.
Kim SG; Seo HS; Lee HH; Song KY; Park CH
J Gastric Cancer; 2017 Sep; 17(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 28970951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Updates in the Eighth Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Classification for Urologic Cancers.
Paner GP; Stadler WM; Hansel DE; Montironi R; Lin DW; Amin MB
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):560-569. PubMed ID: 29325693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A modified clinicopathological tumor staging system for survival prediction of patients with penile cancer.
Li ZS; Ornellas AA; Schwentner C; Li X; Chaux A; Netto G; Burnett AL; Tang Y; Geng J; Yao K; Chen XF; Wang B; Liao H; Liu N; Chen P; Lei YH; Mi QW; Rao HL; Xiao YM; Wang QL; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Zou ZJ; Luo JH; Li H; Han H; Zhou FJ
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):68. PubMed ID: 30470255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
