These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35387231)

  • 1. Regulation and management of the biosecurity for synthetic biology.
    Zeng X; Jiang H; Yang G; Ou Y; Lu S; Jiang J; Lei R; Su L
    Synth Syst Biotechnol; 2022 Jun; 7(2):784-790. PubMed ID: 35387231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biosafety and biosecurity: treading China's synbio tightrope.
    Lou Y; Tang X; Liao L; Deng Z; Gao J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):389-392. PubMed ID: 37957090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative risk assessment method for synthetic biology products in the environment.
    Rycroft T; Hamilton K; Haas CN; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 696():133940. PubMed ID: 31446290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consequentialism and the Synthetic Biology Problem.
    Heavey P
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2017 Apr; 26(2):206-229. PubMed ID: 28361719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the molecular characterisation and environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants obtained through synthetic biology.
    ; Naegeli H; Bresson JL; Dalmay T; Dewhurst IC; Epstein MM; Firbank LG; Guerche P; Hejatko J; Moreno FJ; Nogue F; Rostoks N; Sanchez Serrano JJ; Savoini G; Veromann E; Veronesi F; Casacuberta J; De Schrijver A; Messean A; Patron N; Zurbriggen M; Alvarez F; Devos Y; Gennaro A; Streissl F; Papadopoulou N; Mullins E
    EFSA J; 2021 Feb; 19(2):e06301. PubMed ID: 33598046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reflections on the safety regulation of commercialization of synthetic biology products].
    Zeng X; Zhu Z; Weng J
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2024 Mar; 40(3):758-772. PubMed ID: 38545975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the food and feed risk assessment of genetically modified plants obtained through synthetic biology.
    ; Mullins E; Bresson JL; Dalmay T; Dewhurst IC; Epstein MM; Firbank LG; Guerche P; Hejatko J; Moreno FJ; Nogue F; Rostoks N; Sanchez Serrano JJ; Savoini G; Veromann E; Veronesi F; Casacuberta J; Zurbriggen MD; Fernandez A; Gomez Ruiz JA; Gennaro A; Papadopoulou N; Lanzoni A; Naegeli H
    EFSA J; 2022 Jul; 20(7):e07410. PubMed ID: 35873722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synthetic biology: ensuring the greatest global value.
    Hollis A
    Syst Synth Biol; 2013 Sep; 7(3):99-105. PubMed ID: 24432147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the Organism versus Machine Dichotomy: A Review of Ethical Concerns in Synthetic Biology.
    Aravind Paleri V; Hens K
    ACS Synth Biol; 2024 Jan; 13(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 38070167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthetic biology in various cellular and molecular fields: applications, limitations, and perspective.
    Safaei M; Mobini GR; Abiri A; Shojaeian A
    Mol Biol Rep; 2020 Aug; 47(8):6207-6216. PubMed ID: 32507922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synthetic biology: a utilitarian perspective.
    Smith K
    Bioethics; 2013 Oct; 27(8):453-63. PubMed ID: 24010857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a Comprehensive, Adaptive, and International Biosafety and Biosecurity Program for Advanced Biotechnology: The iGEM Experience.
    Millett P; Binz T; Evans SW; Kuiken T; Oye K; Palmer MJ; van der Vlugt C; Yambao K; Yu S
    Appl Biosaf; 2019 Jun; 24(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 36033940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Building biosecurity for synthetic biology.
    Trump BD; Galaitsi SE; Appleton E; Bleijs DA; Florin MV; Gollihar JD; Hamilton RA; Kuiken T; Lentzos F; Mampuys R; Merad M; Novossiolova T; Oye K; Perkins E; Garcia-Reyero N; Rhodes C; Linkov I
    Mol Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 16(7):e9723. PubMed ID: 32692486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a Biosecurity Checklist for Laboratory Assessment and Monitoring.
    Brizee S; van Passel MWJ; van den Berg LM; Feakes D; Izar A; Lin KTB; Podin Y; Yunus Z; Bleijs DA
    Appl Biosaf; 2019 Jun; 24(2):83-89. PubMed ID: 32655326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists' Views on the Ethics, Promises and Practices of Synthetic Biology: A Qualitative Study of Australian Scientific Practice.
    Dalziell J; Rogers W
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Dec; 29(6):41. PubMed ID: 38082028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three synthetic biology applications and their paths to impact in Australia: Cane toads, bacteriophages, and biomining microbes.
    Carter L; Mankad A; Hobman EV; Weynberg KD; Kaksonen AH; Cooper C
    Biotechnol J; 2022 Sep; 17(9):e2200009. PubMed ID: 35652854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intellectual property and funding: fueling Chinese synbio.
    Liao L; Lou Y; Tang X; Deng Z; Gao J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2024 Mar; 42(3):258-260. PubMed ID: 37980185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthetic biology and biosecurity: challenging the "myths".
    Jefferson C; Lentzos F; Marris C
    Front Public Health; 2014; 2():115. PubMed ID: 25191649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic biology in the German press: how implications of metaphors shape representations of morality and responsibility.
    Döring M
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2018 Jun; 14(1):14. PubMed ID: 29936670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.