These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35387514)

  • 1. Caring for robots: How care comes to matter in human-machine interfacing.
    Lipp B
    Soc Stud Sci; 2023 Oct; 53(5):660-685. PubMed ID: 35387514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Tactile Ethics of Soft Robotics: Designing Wisely for Human-Robot Interaction.
    Arnold T; Scheutz M
    Soft Robot; 2017 Jun; 4(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 29182090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.
    Tobis S; Piasek-Skupna J; Neumann-Podczaska A; Suwalska A; Wieczorowska-Tobis K
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e46617. PubMed ID: 37540548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction.
    Dautenhahn K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Apr; 362(1480):679-704. PubMed ID: 17301026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethica ex machina: issues in roboethics.
    Mushiaki S
    J Int Bioethique; 2013 Dec; 24(4):17-26, 176-7. PubMed ID: 24558732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Persuasive robots should avoid authority: The effects of formal and real authority on persuasion in human-robot interaction.
    Saunderson SP; Nejat G
    Sci Robot; 2021 Sep; 6(58):eabd5186. PubMed ID: 34550717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial lives, analogies and symbolic thought: an anthropological insight on robots and AI.
    Becker J
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2023 Jun; 99():89-96. PubMed ID: 37141842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust in socially assistive robots: Considerations for use in rehabilitation.
    Langer A; Feingold-Polak R; Mueller O; Kellmeyer P; Levy-Tzedek S
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Sep; 104():231-239. PubMed ID: 31348963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do?
    Liang N; Nejat G
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The entwinement of policy, design and care scripts: Providing alternative choice-dependency situations with care robots.
    Nickelsen NCM; Simonsen Abildgaard J
    Sociol Health Illn; 2022 Feb; 44(2):451-468. PubMed ID: 35092619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When a robot is social: spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics.
    Alac M; Movellan J; Tanaka F
    Soc Stud Sci; 2011 Dec; 41(6):893-926. PubMed ID: 22400423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportunities.
    Kok BC; Soh H
    Curr Robot Rep; 2020; 1(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 34977590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical perceptions towards real-world use of companion robots with older people and people with dementia: survey opinions among younger adults.
    Bradwell HL; Winnington R; Thill S; Jones RB
    BMC Geriatr; 2020 Jul; 20(1):244. PubMed ID: 32664904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction.
    Cross ES; Hortensius R; Wykowska A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 374(1771):20180024. PubMed ID: 30852997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint Interaction and Mutual Understanding in Social Robotics.
    Schleidgen S; Friedrich O
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Oct; 28(6):48. PubMed ID: 36289139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the role of human-following robots in supporting the mobility and wellbeing of older people.
    Li S; Milligan K; Blythe P; Zhang Y; Edwards S; Palmarini N; Corner L; Ji Y; Zhang F; Namdeo A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6512. PubMed ID: 37081106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurse preferences of caring robots: A conjoint experiment to explore most valued robot features.
    Zrínyi M; Pakai A; Lampek K; Vass D; Siket Újváriné A; Betlehem J; Oláh A
    Nurs Open; 2023 Jan; 10(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 35762116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human-Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults.
    Rogers WA; Kadylak T; Bayles MA
    Hum Factors; 2022 May; 64(3):441-450. PubMed ID: 34461761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living.
    Huang T; Huang C
    Work; 2021; 69(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 34024801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot and Feasibility Study on Elderly Support Services Using Communicative Robots and Monitoring Sensors Integrated With Cloud Robotics.
    Obayashi K; Masuyama S
    Clin Ther; 2020 Feb; 42(2):364-371.e4. PubMed ID: 31987582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.