BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35387753)

  • 1. Standardised or individualised X-ray tube angle for mediolateral oblique projection in digital mammography?
    Moshina N; Bjørnson EW; Holen ÅS; Larsen M; Hansestad B; Tøsdal L; Hofvind S
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):772-778. PubMed ID: 35387753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
    Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
    Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography image quality: model for predicting compliance with posterior nipple line criterion.
    Spuur K; Hung WT; Poulos A; Rickard M
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):713-8. PubMed ID: 20621431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review.
    Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua KC; Min LC; Abraham KT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23270962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pectoral muscle removal in mammogram images: A novel approach for improved accuracy and efficiency.
    Chen S; Bennett DL; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Causes Control; 2024 Jan; 35(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 37676616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):562-80. PubMed ID: 19816741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification and segmentation of obscure pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique mammograms.
    Wei CH; Gwo CY; Huang PJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150802. PubMed ID: 27043966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of pectoral muscle based on topographic map and shape-shifting silhouette.
    Mughal B; Muhammad N; Sharif M; Rehman A; Saba T
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(1):778. PubMed ID: 30068304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.
    Zhou C; Wei J; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Douglas JA
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2289-99. PubMed ID: 20527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images.
    Sansone M; Marrone S; Di Salvio G; Belfiore MP; Gatta G; Fusco R; Vanore L; Zuiani C; Grassi F; Vietri MT; Granata V; Grassi R
    Radiol Med; 2022 Aug; 127(8):848-856. PubMed ID: 35816260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.
    Bora VB; Kothari AG; Keskar AG
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26259521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic positioning: evaluation from the view box.
    Bassett LW; Hirbawi IA; DeBruhl N; Hayes MK
    Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):803-6. PubMed ID: 8351351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Kinoshita SK; Azevedo-Marques PM; Pereira RR; Rodrigues JA; Rangayyan RM
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Mar; 21(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 17436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
    Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.