312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35388806)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of
Liu X; Wang Q; Zhang B; Jiang T; Zeng W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 35388806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Satapathy S; Singh H; Kumar R; Mittal BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 32755196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection rate of fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer in primary staging and biochemical recurrence with different serum PSA levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu X; Jiang T; Gao C; Liu H; Sun Y; Zou Q; Tang R; Zeng W
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():911146. PubMed ID: 35936732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Ferrari M; Treglia G
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():3502389. PubMed ID: 35002568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The performance of
Qin ZQ; Pan GJ; Xu Z; Wang H; Xu LW; Jia RP
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(4):373-379. PubMed ID: 34747721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of [
Mingels C; Bohn KP; Rominger A; Afshar-Oromieh A; Alberts I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jun; 49(7):2436-2444. PubMed ID: 35067735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histopathologically Validated Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT in the Primary and Secondary Staging of Prostate Cancer and the Impact of PSMA-PET/CT on Clinical Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Jeet V; Parkinson B; Song R; Sharma R; Hoyle M
Semin Nucl Med; 2023 Sep; 53(5):706-718. PubMed ID: 37005145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive
Perera M; Papa N; Christidis D; Wetherell D; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):926-937. PubMed ID: 27363387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of
Rahbar K; Afshar-Oromieh A; Seifert R; Wagner S; Schäfers M; Bögemann M; Weckesser M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2055-2061. PubMed ID: 30027419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the value of
Luo L; Zheng A; Chang R; Li Y; Gao J; Wang Z; Duan X
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 37924154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PSMA-targeted Radiotracers versus
Tan N; Oyoyo U; Bavadian N; Ferguson N; Mukkamala A; Calais J; Davenport MS
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 32396045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels.
Kabasakal L; Demirci E; Nematyazar J; Akyel R; Razavi B; Ocak M; Aygun A; Obek C; Kural AR
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Feb; 38(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 27893589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
