These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35389696)

  • 1. Individual differences in working memory capacity, attention control, fluid intelligence, and pupillary measures of arousal.
    Robison MK; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1296-1310. PubMed ID: 35389696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory capacity does not always support future-oriented mind-wandering.
    McVay JC; Unsworth N; McMillan BD; Kane MJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 23458550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence?
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Souza AS; von Bastian CC; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Aug; 148(8):1335-1372. PubMed ID: 30958017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing locus coeruleus-norepinephrine accounts of working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence.
    Robison MK; Ralph KJ; Gondoli DM; Torres A; Campbell S; Brewer GA; Gibson BS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 23(4):1014-1058. PubMed ID: 37081225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.
    Robison MK; Brewer GA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3273-3290. PubMed ID: 32651927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patience is a virtue: Individual differences in cue-evoked pupil responses under temporal certainty.
    Hood AVB; Hart KM; Marchak FM; Hutchison KA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1286-1303. PubMed ID: 35396616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.
    Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 28639800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction.
    Broadway JM; Engle RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21470583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):77-103. PubMed ID: 30998072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of working memory capacity and lapses of attention for variation in error monitoring.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 35426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():14-25. PubMed ID: 24793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting over it: Working memory capacity and affective responses to stressful events in daily life.
    Garrison KE; Schmeichel BJ
    Emotion; 2022 Apr; 22(3):418-429. PubMed ID: 32463277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity.
    Foster JL; Shipstead Z; Harrison TL; Hicks KL; Redick TS; Engle RW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 25217113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1282-1311. PubMed ID: 28108977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relation between working memory capacity and the antisaccade task.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK; Miller AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1420-1447. PubMed ID: 34516206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.
    McVay JC; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 May; 141(2):302-320. PubMed ID: 21875246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking the dynamics of cognitive control to individual differences in working memory capacity: Evidence from reaching behavior.
    Erb CD; Welhaf MS; Smeekens BA; Moreau D; Kane MJ; Marcovitch S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1383-1402. PubMed ID: 34197169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in resting-state pupil size: Evidence for association between working memory capacity and pupil size variability.
    Aminihajibashi S; Hagen T; Foldal MD; Laeng B; Espeseth T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jun; 140():1-7. PubMed ID: 30894328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory.
    Robison MK; Trost JM; Schor D; Gibson BS; Healey MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1355-1366. PubMed ID: 35355225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.