These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35389709)

  • 1. Auditory distance perception by blind and sighted participants for both within- and beyond-reach sources.
    Lombera EN; Etchemendy PE; Spiousas I; Vergara RO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):467-480. PubMed ID: 35389709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory spatial representations of the world are compressed in blind humans.
    Kolarik AJ; Pardhan S; Cirstea S; Moore BC
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):597-606. PubMed ID: 27837259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.
    Kolarik AJ; Cirstea S; Pardhan S
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):623-33. PubMed ID: 23178908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using acoustic information to perceive room size: effects of blindness, room reverberation time, and stimulus.
    Kolarik AJ; Pardhan S; Cirstea S; Moore BC
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):985-90. PubMed ID: 24386717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.
    Kolarik AJ; Moore BC; Zahorik P; Cirstea S; Pardhan S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):373-95. PubMed ID: 26590050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial visual loss disrupts the relationship between judged room size and sound source distance.
    Kolarik AJ; Moore BCJ; Cirstea S; Raman R; Gopalakrishnan S; Pardhan S
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Jan; 240(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 34623459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How visual experience and task context modulate the use of internal and external spatial coordinate for perception and action.
    Crollen V; Spruyt T; Mahau P; Bottini R; Collignon O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 30730176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind.
    Mattioni S; Rezk M; Battal C; Bottini R; Cuculiza Mendoza KE; Oosterhof NN; Collignon O
    Elife; 2020 Feb; 9():. PubMed ID: 32108572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct-location versus verbal report methods for measuring auditory distance perception in the far field.
    Etchemendy PE; Spiousas I; Calcagno ER; Abregú E; Eguia MC; Vergara RO
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 28786043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size-Distance Scaling With Absolute and Relative Auditory Distance Information.
    Yamasaki D; Ashida H
    Multisens Res; 2020 Jul; 33(1):109-126. PubMed ID: 31648194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences.
    Nilsson ME; Schenkman BN
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():223-232. PubMed ID: 26433052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exceptional ability of blind humans to hear sound motion: implications for the emergence of auditory space.
    Lewald J
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jan; 51(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 23178211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial and nonspatial peripheral auditory processing in congenitally blind people.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Neuroreport; 2006 Sep; 17(13):1449-52. PubMed ID: 16932156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial imagery relies on a sensory independent, though sensory sensitive, functional organization within the parietal cortex: a fMRI study of angle discrimination in sighted and congenitally blind individuals.
    Bonino D; Ricciardi E; Bernardi G; Sani L; Gentili C; Vecchi T; Pietrini P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():59-70. PubMed ID: 25575449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory distance perception in front and rear space.
    Aggius-Vella E; Gori M; Campus C; Moore BCJ; Pardhan S; Kolarik AJ; Van der Stoep N
    Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 417():108468. PubMed ID: 35220107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The extent of visual deficit and auditory spatial compensation: evidence from self-positioning from auditory cues.
    Després O; Candas V; Dufour A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):444-7. PubMed ID: 15820651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal cues trick the visual and auditory cortices mimicking spatial cues in blind individuals.
    Gori M; Amadeo MB; Campus C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jun; 41(8):2077-2091. PubMed ID: 32048380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The link between blindness onset and audiospatial processing: testing audiomotor cues in acoustic virtual reality.
    Esposito D; Bollini A; Gori M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():5880-5884. PubMed ID: 34892457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-dimensional sound-localization behavior of early-blind humans.
    Zwiers MP; Van Opstal AJ; Cruysberg JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Sep; 140(2):206-22. PubMed ID: 11521153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does visual experience influence the spatial distribution of auditory attention?
    Lerens E; Renier L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():58-62. PubMed ID: 24378238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.