These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35389710)

  • 1. Conflict-monitoring theory in overtime: Is temporal learning a viable explanation for the congruency sequence effect?
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):497-530. PubMed ID: 35389710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.
    Spinelli G; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):995-1014. PubMed ID: 31144859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):590-607. PubMed ID: 26093801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 35787140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-out for conflict monitoring theory: Preventing rhythmic biases eliminates the list-level proportion congruent effect.
    Schmidt JR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 27977230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the temporal learning account of the list-wide proportion congruence effect.
    Cohen-Shikora ER; Suh J; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1703-1723. PubMed ID: 30589332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects.
    Schmidt JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1496-505. PubMed ID: 27585071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Both congruent and incongruent trials drive the congruency sequence effect: Novel support for an episodic retrieval view of adaptive control in the prime-probe task.
    Dunaway MG; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38647457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.
    Abrahamse EL; Duthoo W; Notebaert W; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1552-62. PubMed ID: 23565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Congruency sequence effects are driven by previous-trial congruency, not previous-trial response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Carp J
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():587. PubMed ID: 24027550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context-Specific Proportion Congruency Effects: An Episodic Learning Account and Computational Model.
    Schmidt JR
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1806. PubMed ID: 27899907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingency learning on the proportional congruency effect of the Stroop task is manifest in deviant processing.
    Suzuki K
    Neuroreport; 2024 Feb; 35(3):170-174. PubMed ID: 38141012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G; Krishna K; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Weissman DH; Jiang J; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2022-2037. PubMed ID: 25089574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.