195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35390459)
1. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics.
Hauk O; Wakeman DG; Henson R
Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):1966-74. PubMed ID: 20884360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.
Hauk O; Stenroos M
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1642-53. PubMed ID: 23616402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches.
Halder T; Talwar S; Jaiswal AK; Banerjee A
eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31311804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A geometric correction scheme for spatial leakage effects in MEG/EEG seed-based functional connectivity mapping.
Wens V; Marty B; Mary A; Bourguignon M; Op de Beeck M; Goldman S; Van Bogaert P; Peigneux P; De Tiège X
Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Nov; 36(11):4604-21. PubMed ID: 26331630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial fidelity of MEG/EEG source estimates: A general evaluation approach.
Samuelsson JG; Peled N; Mamashli F; Ahveninen J; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117430. PubMed ID: 33038537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
