These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35390532)

  • 1. The Accuracy of Portion Size Reporting on Self-Administered Online 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Among Women With Low Incomes.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Guenther PM; Durward C; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Atoloye AT; Marcinow ML; Savoie-Roskos MR; Herrick KA; Dodd KW
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Dec; 122(12):2243-2256. PubMed ID: 35390532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Thompson FE; George SM; Subar AF
    J Nutr; 2016 Dec; 146(12):2567-2573. PubMed ID: 27807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Provision of Assistance Does Not Substantially Impact the Accuracy of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-H Dietary Assessment Tool among Women with Low Incomes.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Guenther PM; Douglass D; Zimmerman T; Kahle LL; Atoloye A; Marcinow M; Savoie-Roskos MR; Dodd KW; Durward C
    J Nutr; 2019 Jan; 149(1):114-122. PubMed ID: 30602015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. School-Age Children Can Recall Some Foods and Beverages Consumed the Prior Day Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) without Assistance.
    Raffoul A; Hobin EP; Sacco JE; Lee KM; Haines J; Robson PJ; Dodd KW; Kirkpatrick SI
    J Nutr; 2019 Jun; 149(6):1019-1026. PubMed ID: 31006813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using 4 technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study.
    Whitton C; Collins CE; Mullan BA; Rollo ME; Dhaliwal SS; Norman R; Boushey CJ; Delp EJ; Zhu F; McCaffrey TA; Kirkpatrick SI; Pollard CM; Healy JD; Hassan A; Garg S; Atyeo P; Mukhtar SA; Kerr DA
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Jul; 120(1):196-210. PubMed ID: 38710447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores Among Adults Based on Observed vs Recalled Dietary Intake.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Guenther PM; Durward C; Atoloye AT; Kahle LL; Subar AF; Reedy J
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Nov; 121(11):2233-2241.e1. PubMed ID: 34366116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Subar AF; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Thompson FE; Kahle LL; George SM; Dodd KW; Potischman N
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2014 Jul; 100(1):233-40. PubMed ID: 24787491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Parental Reporting of Preschoolers' Dietary Intake Using an Online Self-Administered 24-h Recall.
    Wallace A; Kirkpatrick SI; Darlington G; Haines J
    Nutrients; 2018 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30060605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.
    Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progressive 24-Hour Recall: Usability Study of Short Retention Intervals in Web-Based Dietary Assessment Surveys.
    Osadchiy T; Poliakov I; Olivier P; Rowland M; Foster E
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13266. PubMed ID: 32012055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Validation Study of the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall for Children, 2014 Version, at School Lunch.
    Krehbiel CF; DuPaul GJ; Hoffman JA
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 May; 117(5):715-724. PubMed ID: 28017317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Administering a combination of online dietary assessment tools, the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool, and Diet History Questionnaire II, in a cohort of adults in Alberta's Tomorrow Project.
    Solbak NM; Robson PJ; Lo Siou G; Al Rajabi A; Paek S; Vena JE; Kirkpatrick SI
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Jul; 121(7):1312-1326. PubMed ID: 33612438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall for Children, 2012 Version, for Youth Aged 9 to 11 Years: A Validation Study.
    Diep CS; Hingle M; Chen TA; Dadabhoy HR; Beltran A; Baranowski J; Subar AF; Baranowski T
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1591-8. PubMed ID: 25887784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness of Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment Comparing the Automated Self-administered Dietary Assessment Tool, Intake24, and an Image-Assisted Mobile Food Record 24-Hour Recall Relative to Observed Intake: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Feeding Study.
    Whitton C; Healy JD; Collins CE; Mullan B; Rollo ME; Dhaliwal SS; Norman R; Boushey CJ; Delp EJ; Zhu F; McCaffrey TA; Kirkpatrick SI; Atyeo P; Mukhtar SA; Wright JL; Ramos-García C; Pollard CM; Kerr DA
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2021 Dec; 10(12):e32891. PubMed ID: 34924357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Portion Sizes from 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Differed by Sex among Those Who Selected the Same Portion Size Category on a Food Frequency Questionnaire.
    Kang M; Park SY; Boushey CJ; Wilkens LR; Monroe KR; Le Marchand L; Kolonel LN; Murphy SP; Paik HY
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Sep; 118(9):1711-1718. PubMed ID: 29752189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
    Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a Diet Quality Screener for Global Use: Evaluation in a Sample of US Women.
    Kronsteiner-Gicevic S; Mou Y; Bromage S; Fung TT; Willett W
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 May; 121(5):854-871.e6. PubMed ID: 33602635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall.
    Subar AF; Crafts J; Zimmerman TP; Wilson M; Mittl B; Islam NG; McNutt S; Potischman N; Buday R; Hull SG; Baranowski T; Guenther PM; Willis G; Tapia R; Thompson FE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Jan; 110(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 20102828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals.
    Fatehah AA; Poh BK; Shanita SN; Wong JE
    Nutrients; 2018 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30060528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.