158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35390645)
1. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probabilistic Genotyping of Single Cell Replicates from Mixtures Involving First-Degree Relatives Prevents the False Inclusions of Non-Donor Relatives.
Huffman K; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
Kruijver M; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using simulated microhaplotype genotyping data to evaluate the value of machine learning algorithms for inferring DNA mixture contributor numbers.
Wang H; Zhu Q; Huang Y; Cao Y; Hu Y; Wei Y; Wang Y; Hou T; Shan T; Dai X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103008. PubMed ID: 38244524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing.
Liu Z; Wu E; Li R; Liu J; Zang Y; Cong B; Wu R; Xie B; Sun H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jun; 72():103078. PubMed ID: 38889491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.
Lin MH; Bright JA; Pugh SN; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102175. PubMed ID: 31644964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures.
Allen PS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kerr Z; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102434. PubMed ID: 33348219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
