158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35390645)
21. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Budowle B; Coble MD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():172-179. PubMed ID: 30176439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Carrying out common DNA donor analysis using DBLR™ on two or five-cell mini-mixture subsamples for improved discrimination power in complex DNA mixtures.
Huffman K; Kruijver M; Ballantyne J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102908. PubMed ID: 37402330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determining the number and size of background samples derived from an area adjacent to the target sample that provide the greatest support for a POI in a target sample.
Reither JB; Taylor D; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jan; 68():102977. PubMed ID: 38000160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Precision DNA Mixture Interpretation with Single-Cell Profiling.
Ge J; King JL; Smuts A; Budowle B
Genes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
Huffman K; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Variation in assessments of suitability and number of contributors for DNA mixtures.
Hicklin RA; Richetelli N; Emerick BL; Bever RA; Davoren JM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102892. PubMed ID: 37267812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identification of missing persons through kinship analysis by microhaplotype sequencing of single-source DNA and two-person DNA mixtures.
Bai Z; Zhang N; Liu J; Ding H; Zhang Y; Wang T; Gao J; Ou X
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 May; 58():102689. PubMed ID: 35316721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exploring the probative value of mixed DNA profiles.
Kruijver M; Bright JA; Kelly H; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():1-10. PubMed ID: 30913444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A microhaplotypes panel for massively parallel sequencing analysis of DNA mixtures.
Chen P; Deng C; Li Z; Pu Y; Yang J; Yu Y; Li K; Li D; Liang W; Zhang L; Chen F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():140-149. PubMed ID: 30836262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. ProbRank: An efficient DNA database search method for complex mixtures per a quantitative likelihood ratio model.
Hoogenboom J; Sijen T; Benschop C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102884. PubMed ID: 37150077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
