158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35390645)
41. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.
Pascali VL
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0247344. PubMed ID: 34653182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Using big data from probabilistic genotyping to solve crime.
Taylor D; Abarno D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102631. PubMed ID: 34861631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A preliminary study on identification of the blood donor in a body fluid mixture using a novel compound genetic marker blood-specific methylation-microhaplotype.
Tang X; Wen D; Jin X; Wang C; Xu W; Qu W; Xu R; Jia H; Liu Y; Li X; Chen S; Fu X; Liang B; Li J; Liu Y; Zha L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 May; 70():103031. PubMed ID: 38493735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Analysis of nondegraded and degraded DNA mixtures of close relatives using massively parallel sequencing.
Hwa HL; Wu MY; Lee JC; Yin HI; Hsu PM; Li SF; Hwu WL; Su CW
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Feb; 42():101631. PubMed ID: 31751795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Automated estimation of the number of contributors in autosomal short tandem repeat profiles using a machine learning approach.
Benschop CCG; van der Linden J; Hoogenboom J; Ypma R; Haned H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102150. PubMed ID: 31476660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Exploring how the LR of a POI in a target sample is impacted by awareness of the profile of the background derived from an area adjacent to the target sample.
Reither JB; Taylor D; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102868. PubMed ID: 37001465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implementation and validation of an improved allele specific stutter filtering method for electropherogram interpretation.
Kalafut T; Schuerman C; Sutton J; Faris T; Armogida L; Bright JA; Buckleton J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():50-56. PubMed ID: 29660688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.
Bright JA; Cheng K; Kerr Z; McGovern C; Kelly H; Moretti TR; Smith MA; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Coble MD; Alghafri R; Allen PS; Barber A; Beamer V; Buettner C; Russell M; Gehrig C; Hicks T; Charak J; Cheong-Wing K; Ciecko A; Davis CT; Donley M; Pedersen N; Gartside B; Granger D; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Reisinger E; Kennedy J; Grammer E; Kaplan M; Hansen D; Larsen HJ; Laureano A; Li C; Lien E; Lindberg E; Kelly C; Mallinder B; Malsom S; Yacovone-Margetts A; McWhorter A; Prajapati SM; Powell T; Shutler G; Stevenson K; Stonehouse AR; Smith L; Murakami J; Halsing E; Wright D; Clark L; Taylor DA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():1-8. PubMed ID: 30665115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluating DNA Mixtures with Contributors from Different Populations Using Probabilistic Genotyping.
Kruijver M; Kelly H; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36672780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Single-cell investigative genetics: Single-cell data produces genotype distributions concentrated at the true genotype across all mixture complexities.
Grgicak CM; Bhembe Q; Slooten K; Sheth NC; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103000. PubMed ID: 38199167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Guiding proposition setting in forensic DNA interpretation.
Buckleton J; Kalafut T; Curran J
Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):540-546. PubMed ID: 36336447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
