These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35390700)

  • 1. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Holistic Communication Approach to an Automated Vehicle's Communication With Pedestrians: Combining Vehicle Kinematics With External Human-Machine Interfaces for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():882394. PubMed ID: 35967627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating Implicit and Explicit Communication of Highly Automated Vehicles in Japan: How do Light-band eHMIs affect Pedestrians' Willingness to Cross, Trust and Perceived Safety?
    Lau M; Lee J; Kitazaki S; Daimon T; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Nov; 207():107719. PubMed ID: 39096539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.
    Song Y; Jiang Q; Chen W; Zhuang X; Ma G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107115. PubMed ID: 37209555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles from Pedestrians' Perspective: A Survey Study.
    Guo J; Yuan Q; Yu J; Chen X; Yu W; Cheng Q; Wang W; Luo W; Jiang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.
    Métayer N; Coeugnet S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103478. PubMed ID: 34116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of eHMI Malfunctions on Younger and Elderly Pedestrians' Trust and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Communication Signals.
    Hensch AC; Kreißig I; Beggiato M; Krems JF
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():866475. PubMed ID: 35592174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 'invisible gorilla' during pedestrian-AV interaction: Effects of secondary tasks on pedestrians' reaction to eHMIs.
    Zhao X; Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Bourgeois-Bougrine S; Gruyer D; Delhomme P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107246. PubMed ID: 37597379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions.
    de Clercq K; Dietrich A; Núñez Velasco JP; de Winter J; Happee R
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1353-1370. PubMed ID: 30912985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hello, is it me you're Stopping for? The Effect of external Human Machine Interface Familiarity on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour in an Ambiguous Situation.
    Lee YM; Sidorov V; Madigan R; Garcia de Pedro J; Markkula G; Merat N
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; ():187208241272070. PubMed ID: 39178219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian' crossing behavior.
    Lee YM; Madigan R; Uzondu C; Garcia J; Romano R; Markkula G; Merat N
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():270-280. PubMed ID: 35249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles in Shared Spaces: A Review of the Human-Computer Interaction Literature.
    Brill S; Payre W; Debnath A; Horan B; Birrell S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to Design the eHMI of AVs for Urgent Warning to Other Drivers with Limited Visibility?
    Lim D; Kwon Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.
    Devi Subramanian L; O'Neal EE; Kim NY; Noonan M; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107567. PubMed ID: 38669901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How should external human-machine interfaces behave? Examining the effects of colour, position, message, activation distance, vehicle yielding, and visual distraction among 1,434 participants.
    Bazilinskyy P; Kooijman L; Dodou D; de Winter JCF
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103450. PubMed ID: 33971539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External Human-Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading: An Examination of Trust Development and Misuse in a CAVE-Based Pedestrian Simulation Environment.
    Kaleefathullah AA; Merat N; Lee YM; Eisma YB; Madigan R; Garcia J; Winter J
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):1070-1085. PubMed ID: 33242999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effectiveness of eHMI Displays on Pedestrian-Autonomous Vehicle Interaction in Mixed-Traffic Environments.
    Alhawiti A; Kwigizile V; Oh JS; Asher ZD; Hakimi O; Aljohani S; Ayantayo S
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(15):. PubMed ID: 39124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour.
    Tian K; Tzigieras A; Wei C; Lee YM; Holmes C; Leonetti M; Merat N; Romano R; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107173. PubMed ID: 37336051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to improve pedestrians' trust in automated vehicles: new road infrastructure, external human-machine interface with anthropomorphism, or conventional road signaling?
    Bonneviot F; Coeugnet S; Brangier E
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1129341. PubMed ID: 37213373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks.
    Imanishimwe D; Kumar A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107278. PubMed ID: 37683566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.