These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35391581)

  • 1. Genesis of "negative pressure" during hanging drop; the answer is positive pressure.
    Miyabe M
    J Anesth; 2022 Jun; 36(3):441-443. PubMed ID: 35391581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The techniques to identify the epidural space do not influence the success rate in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a comparison between loss-of-resistance and hanging-drop].
    Kobayashi Y; Ichimiya T; Sekine R; Toriyabe M; Seki S; Namiki A
    Masui; 2001 May; 50(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 11424463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidrum(®): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle.
    Sawada A; Kii N; Yoshikawa Y; Yamakage M
    J Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 22081113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Training of epidural anesthesia with pressure-guided method in pediatric patients].
    Saito K; Inomata S; Uemura A; Osaka Y; Miyabe M; Toyooka H
    Masui; 2002 Aug; 51(8):927-30. PubMed ID: 12229151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the hanging-drop technique and running-drip method for identifying the epidural space in dogs.
    Martinez-Taboada F; Redondo JI
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 44(2):329-336. PubMed ID: 28214220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 'membrane in syringe' technique that allows identification of the epidural space with saline while avoids injection of air into the epidural space.
    Lin BC; Chen KB; Chang CS; Wu KC; Liu YC; Chen CC; Wu RS
    Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2002 Jun; 40(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 12194391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematical analysis of epidural space location.
    Rodiera J; Calabuig R; Aliaga L; Espinosa W; Hobeich F; Oferil F; Gual A
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1995; 12(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 8820327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques.
    Hoffmann VL; Vercauteren MP; Vreugde JP; Hans GH; Coppejans HC; Adriaensen HA
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 83(5):807-9. PubMed ID: 10690148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot study to compare epidural identification and catheterization using a saline-filled syringe versus a continuous hydrostatic pressure system.
    Samhan YM; El-Sabae HH; Khafagy HF; Maher MA
    J Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):607-10. PubMed ID: 23408046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure monitoring devices may undetect epidural space: a report on the use of Compuflo® system for epidural injection.
    Carassiti M; Pascarella G; Strumia A; Cataldo R; Antinolfi V; Costa F; Agrò FE
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Feb; 36(1):283-286. PubMed ID: 34148201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of thoracic epidural pressure in the sitting and lateral decubitus positions.
    Gil NS; Lee JH; Yoon SZ; Jeon Y; Lim YJ; Bahk JH
    Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 18580174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the evidence? The issue of verifying correct needle position during epidural anaesthesia in dogs.
    Adami C; Gendron K
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 44(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 28215814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-effective, non-invasive system for pressure monitoring during epidural needle insertion: Design, development and bench tests.
    Tesei M; Saccomandi P; Massaroni C; Quarta R; Carassiti M; Schena E; Setola R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():194-197. PubMed ID: 28268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the needle tip height on the puncture force in a simplified epidural anesthesia simulator.
    Naemura K; Uchino Y; Saito H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3504-7. PubMed ID: 18002752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalad angulation of epidural needle insertion may be an important factor for safe epidural space approach: a mathematical model.
    Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Furuya H
    Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2011; 61(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 22063377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of epidural space by drip method.
    Michel MZ; Lawes EG
    Reg Anesth; 1991; 16(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 1911502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards a realistic in vitro experience of epidural Tuohy needle insertion.
    Vaughan N; Dubey VN; Wee MY; Isaacs R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):767-77. PubMed ID: 23636758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of electrical stimulation to monitor epidural needle advancement in a porcine model.
    Tsui BCH; Emery D; Uwiera RRE; Finucane B
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1611-1613. PubMed ID: 15920182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double Assurance of Epidural Space Detection Using Fiberoptics-Based Needle Design and Autofluorescence Technologies for Epidural Blockade in Painless Labor.
    Gong CA; Lee HC; Chang Y; Ting CK; Tu PH
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30360473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks.
    Gülen G; Akkaya T; Ozkan D; Kaydul M; Gözaydin O; Gümüş H
    Agri; 2012; 24(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 22399127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.