157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35391766)
1. Development and Validation of an AI-driven Mammographic Breast Density Classification Tool Based on Radiologist Consensus.
Magni V; Interlenghi M; Cozzi A; Alì M; Salvatore C; Azzena AA; Capra D; Carriero S; Della Pepa G; Fazzini D; Granata G; Monti CB; Muscogiuri G; Pellegrino G; Schiaffino S; Castiglioni I; Papa S; Sardanelli F
Radiol Artif Intell; 2022 Mar; 4(2):e210199. PubMed ID: 35391766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
Lee J; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.
Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Peng H; Luo Y; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):314-321. PubMed ID: 29159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network.
Ciritsis A; Rossi C; Vittoria De Martini I; Eberhard M; Marcon M; Becker AS; Berger N; Boss A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 92(1093):20180691. PubMed ID: 30209957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External Evaluation of a Mammography-based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Breast Cancer in an Ethnically Diverse Population.
Omoleye OJ; Woodard AE; Howard FM; Zhao F; Yoshimatsu TF; Zheng Y; Pearson AT; Levental M; Aribisala BS; Kulkarni K; Karczmar GS; Olopade OI; Abe H; Huo D
Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e220299. PubMed ID: 38074785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks.
Sexauer R; Hejduk P; Borkowski K; Ruppert C; Weikert T; Dellas S; Schmidt N
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):4589-4596. PubMed ID: 36856841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.
Sacchetto D; Morra L; Agliozzo S; Bernardi D; Björklund T; Brancato B; Bravetti P; Carbonaro LA; Correale L; Fantò C; Favettini E; Martincich L; Milanesio L; Mombelloni S; Monetti F; Morrone D; Pellegrini M; Pesce B; Petrillo A; Saguatti G; Stevanin C; Trimboli RM; Tuttobene P; Valentini M; Marra V; Frigerio A; Bert A; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 25929945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation.
Lewin J; Schoenherr S; Seebass M; Lin M; Philpotts L; Etesami M; Butler R; Durand M; Heller S; Heacock L; Moy L; Tocino I; Westerhoff M
Clin Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():200-205. PubMed ID: 37421715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast Density Evaluation According to BI-RADS 5th Edition on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: AI Automated Assessment Versus Human Visual Assessment.
Tari DU; Santonastaso R; De Lucia DR; Santarsiere M; Pinto F
J Pers Med; 2023 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37108994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of mammographic breast density and its correlation with BI-RADS in elder women using machine learning approach.
Lee ZY; Goh YLE; Lai C
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 53(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 34801440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]