These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35392058)
41. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhuang CL; Huang DD; Chen FF; Zhou CJ; Zheng BS; Chen BC; Shen X; Yu Z Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2091-100. PubMed ID: 25414064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Zhao JH; Sun JX; Gao P; Chen XW; Song YX; Huang XZ; Xu HM; Wang ZN BMC Cancer; 2014 Aug; 14():607. PubMed ID: 25148902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery for patients treated with radical cystectomy and ileal urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Feng D; Liu S; Lu Y; Wei W; Han P Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Aug; 9(4):1743-1753. PubMed ID: 32944535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical efficacy and safety of 3D vascular reconstruction combined with 3D navigation in laparoscopic hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Jiang J; Pei L; Jiang R J Gastrointest Oncol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):1215-1223. PubMed ID: 35837151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis. Ji HB; Zhu WT; Wei Q; Wang XX; Wang HB; Chen QP World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Apr; 24(15):1666-1678. PubMed ID: 29686474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Short-term efficacy of precise hepatectomy and traditional hepatectomy for primary liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Niu X; Liu J; Feng Z; Zhang T; Su T; Han W J Gastrointest Oncol; 2021 Dec; 12(6):3022-3032. PubMed ID: 35070427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Microsurgery Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Varicocele: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Wang H; Ji ZG J Invest Surg; 2020 Jan; 33(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 30339469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs for Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis. Wang C; Zheng G; Zhang W; Zhang F; Lv S; Wang A; Fang Z J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Mar; 21(3):472-486. PubMed ID: 28101720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus standard recovery for elective gastric cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lee Y; Yu J; Doumouras AG; Li J; Hong D Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 32():75-87. PubMed ID: 31786352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ziogas IA; Giannis D; Esagian SM; Economopoulos KP; Tohme S; Geller DA Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 32989544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fast track program in liver resection: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Ahmed EA; Montalti R; Nicolini D; Vincenzi P; Coletta M; Vecchi A; Mocchegiani F; Vivarelli M Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(28):e4154. PubMed ID: 27428206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Montalti R; Berardi G; Patriti A; Vivarelli M; Troisi RI World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 21(27):8441-51. PubMed ID: 26217097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Enhanced Recovery Program Versus Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy. Liang X; Ying H; Wang H; Xu H; Yu H; Cai L; Wang Y; Tong Y; Ji L; Luo R; Cai XJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(8):e2835. PubMed ID: 26937913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Tumors in the Posterosuperior Segments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Dave M; Tarazi M; Satyadas T Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2020 Apr; 30(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 31929396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing gynecologic laparoscopic procedures with and without robotic assistance. Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Ware K; Govindan M; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Coriell C; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Filippelli C; Loli H; Sainz K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Oct; 265():30-38. PubMed ID: 34418694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis. Guan R; Chen Y; Yang K; Ma D; Gong X; Shen B; Peng C Asian J Surg; 2019 Jan; 42(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 30170946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Lateral Hepatectomy and Open Left Lateral Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis. Wang X; Chen A; Fu Q; Cai C Front Surg; 2021; 8():749285. PubMed ID: 34869557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Single-Port vs Multiport Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Yu M; Shen K; Zhao L J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 27590569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]