These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35393126)
61. An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses. Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Jafari MD; Hanna M; Koh CY; Inaba CS; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Nguyen NT; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1769-1775. PubMed ID: 28916858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. IDEAL Stage 2a/b prospective cohort study of transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer. Harji D; Fernandez B; Boissieras L; Celerier B; Rullier E; Denost Q Colorectal Dis; 2023 Dec; 25(12):2346-2353. PubMed ID: 37919463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A new anastomotic leakage model in circular double stapled colorectal anastomosis after low anterior rectum resection in pigs. Wenger FA; Szucsik E; Hoinoiu BF; Ionac M; Walz MK; Schmid KW; Reis H J Invest Surg; 2013 Dec; 26(6):364-72. PubMed ID: 23957829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Stapled versus hand-sewn pediatric intestinal anastomoses: A retrospective cohort study. Hintz GC; Alshehri A; Bell CM; Butterworth SA J Pediatr Surg; 2018 May; 53(5):959-963. PubMed ID: 29559177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Stapled vs handsewn anastomosis and anastomotic leaks in gastric cancer surgery-a population-based nationwide study in Finland. Kvist E; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Jalkanen A; Junttila A; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Louhimo J; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH; J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(6):820-823. PubMed ID: 38599994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience. Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Lustosa SA; Matos D; Atallah AN; Castro AA Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003144. PubMed ID: 11687041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Intracorporeal antimesenteric ancillary trocar: an anastomotic technique facilitating natural orifice specimen extraction in left-sided colorectal surgery. Seow-En I; Li KK; Tan EK Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 26(4):766-771. PubMed ID: 38302860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Reinforcement of staple line of colorectal anastomosis for leakage prevention: a systematic review and metaanalysis]. Balkarov AA; Ponomarenko AA; Alekseev MV; Rybakov EG; Frolov SA Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2019; (8):53-58. PubMed ID: 31464275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Comparison of Hand-Sewn with Stapled Anastomosis in Neonatal Intestinal Atresia Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. Zheng Z; Jin Z; Gao M; Tang C; Gong Y; Huang L; Liu Y; Wang J J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Jun; 32(6):696-701. PubMed ID: 35404135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Is Circular Fibrin Sealing of Low Rectal Anastomosis Able to Prevent Leakage in 21-Day Follow-up? Randomized Experimental Trial in Pigs. Wenger FA; Szucsik E; Hoinoiu BF; Cimpean AM; Matonick JP; Ionac M; Raica M Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):408-419. PubMed ID: 31056009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses. Tabola R; Cirocchi R; Fingerhut A; Arezzo A; Randolph J; Grassi V; Binda GA; D'Andrea V; Abraha I; Popivanov G; Di Saverio S; Zbar A Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Mar; 21(3):177-184. PubMed ID: 28132113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage using its reinforcement (results of the randomized study)]. Balkarov AA; Alekseev MV; Rybakov EG; Frolov SA; Achkasov SI Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2021; (7):18-23. PubMed ID: 34270189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study. Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Evaluation of bioabsorbable seamguard for staple line reinforcement in stapled rectal anastomoses. Fajardo AD; Amador-Ortiz C; Chun J; Stewart D; Fleshman JW Surg Innov; 2012 Sep; 19(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 22158845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The effect of staple height and rectal-wall thickness on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection. Naoi D; Horie H; Sadatomo A; Koinuma K; Ota G; Oshiro K; Tahara M; Mori K; Ito H; Inoue Y; Homma Y; Mimura T; Lefor AK; Sata N Asian J Surg; 2023 Apr; 46(4):1577-1582. PubMed ID: 36216667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Double-row staple technology versus triple-row staple technology for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. McKechnie T; Shi V; Huang E; Huo B; Doumouras A; Amin N; Eskicioglu C; Hong D Surgery; 2024 Sep; 176(3):633-644. PubMed ID: 38876899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Factors affecting anastomotic leak after colorectal anastomosis in patients without protective stoma in tertiary care hospital. Sultan R; Chawla T; Zaidi M J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 Feb; 64(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 24640806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]