These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35394466)

  • 1. Evaluating Intraocular Pressure After Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Comparison of Different Tonometers.
    Lanza M; Sbordone S; Tortori A; Gironi Carnevale UA; Melillo P; Simonelli F
    J Glaucoma; 2022 Jun; 31(6):406-412. PubMed ID: 35394466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Mele L; Carnevale UA; Irregolare C; Lanza A; Femiano F; Bifani M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 26481062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of IOP obtained in different kind of eyes with contact and no contact tonometers.
    Sbordone S; Ragucci A; Iaccarino G; Scognamiglio G; Leone A; Carnevale UAG; Lanza M
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 36760919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular Pressure Changes in Myopic Patients Undergoing Laser In-Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.
    Humayun S; Bangash YW; Ishaq M; Shah AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 37804021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Sadigh AL; Fouladi RF; Hashemi H; Beheshtnejad AH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 22940796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry measuring intraocular pressure changes in eyes which underwent myopic laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
    Ang RET; Rixon A; Kilgore K; Schweitzer J
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):503. PubMed ID: 36539706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.
    Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.
    Levy Y; Zadok D; Glovinsky Y; Krakowski D; Nemet P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Apr; 25(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 10198852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
    Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure after myopic laser refractive surgery measured with a new Goldmann convex prism: correlations with GAT and ORA.
    Iglesias M; Kudsieh B; Laiseca A; Santos C; Nadal J; Barraquer R; Casaroli-Marano RP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):79. PubMed ID: 35168601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
    Roszkowska AM; De Grazia L; Cirone M; Ferreri G
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 19321977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Cennamo M; Irregolare C; Romano V; Carnevale UA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 25467287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.
    Aristeidou AP; Labiris G; Katsanos A; Fanariotis M; Foudoulakis NC; Kozobolis VP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 249(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 20577756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.