These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35394908)

  • 21. Simulating receptive fields of human visual cortex for 3D image quality prediction.
    Shao F; Chen W; Lin W; Jiang Q; Jiang G
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jul; 55(21):5488-96. PubMed ID: 27463895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Human primary visual cortex shows larger population receptive fields for binocular disparity-defined stimuli.
    Alvarez I; Hurley SA; Parker AJ; Bridge H
    Brain Struct Funct; 2021 Dec; 226(9):2819-2838. PubMed ID: 34347164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The binocular fusion of human vision on stereoscopic displays--field of view and environment effects.
    Nagata S
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1273-84. PubMed ID: 8888639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity.
    Poggio GF; Gonzalez F; Krause F
    J Neurosci; 1988 Dec; 8(12):4531-50. PubMed ID: 3199191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stereoscopic 3D Visual Discomfort Prediction: A Dynamic Accommodation and Vergence Interaction Model.
    Oh H; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Feb; 25(2):615-29. PubMed ID: 26672036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. HFFNet: hierarchical feature fusion network for blind binocular image quality prediction.
    Pan Y; Zhou W; Ye L; Yu L
    Appl Opt; 2022 Sep; 61(26):7602-7607. PubMed ID: 36256359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image quality assessment based on the perceived structural similarity index of an image.
    Yao J; Shen J; Yao C
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Mar; 20(5):9385-9409. PubMed ID: 37161248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning Receptive Fields and Quality Lookups for Blind Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images.
    Shao F; Lin W; Wang S; Jiang G; Yu M; Dai Q
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Mar; 46(3):730-43. PubMed ID: 25872220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rich Structural Index for Stereoscopic Image Quality Assessment.
    Zhang H; Hu X; Gou R; Zhang L; Zheng B; Shen Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toward a Blind Deep Quality Evaluator for Stereoscopic Images Based on Monocular and Binocular Interactions.
    Shao F; Tian W; Lin W; Jiang G; Dai Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 May; 25(5):2059-74. PubMed ID: 26960225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using HVS Dual-Pathway and Contrast Sensitivity to Blindly Assess Image Quality.
    Chen F; Fu H; Yu H; Chu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 37430884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simulating binocular vision for no-reference 3D visual quality measurement.
    Zhou WJ; Yu L; Wu MW
    Opt Express; 2015 Sep; 23(18):23710-25. PubMed ID: 26368467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual Attention Prediction for Stereoscopic Video by Multi-Module Fully Convolutional Network.
    Fang Y; Zhang C; Huang H; Lei J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Nov; 28(11):5253-5265. PubMed ID: 31107651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image2Brain: a cross-modality model for blind stereoscopic image quality ranking.
    Shen L; Li X; Pan Z; Sun X; Zhang Y; Zheng J
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Aug; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 37607552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Chang HW; Yang H; Gan Y; Wang MH
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Oct; 22(10):4007-18. PubMed ID: 23751962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No-reference quality assessment of natural stereopairs.
    Chen MJ; Cormack LK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Sep; 22(9):3379-91. PubMed ID: 23771336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Functional MRI of self-controlled stereoscopic depth perception.
    Merboldt KD; Baudewig J; Treue S; Frahm J
    Neuroreport; 2002 Oct; 13(14):1721-5. PubMed ID: 12395111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transfer Function Model of Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Temporal Visual Discomfort Experienced When Viewing Stereoscopic 3D Images.
    Kim T; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):4335-47. PubMed ID: 26241973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Binocular Stereo-Imaging-Perception System with a Wide Field-of-View and Infrared- and Visible Light-Dual-Band Fusion.
    Zhu Y; Zhang D; Zhou Y; Jin W; Zhou L; Wu G; Li Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of stereoscopic picture quality with CFF.
    Mitsuhashi T
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1344-56. PubMed ID: 8974885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.