These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35394908)

  • 41. A Miniature Binocular Endoscope with Local Feature Matching and Stereo Matching for 3D Measurement and 3D Reconstruction.
    Wang D; Liu H; Cheng X
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jul; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 30002288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Blind Stereoscopic Video Quality Assessment: From Depth Perception to Overall Experience.
    Zhibo Chen ; Wei Zhou ; Weiping Li
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Feb; 27(2):721-734. PubMed ID: 29185989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The processing of stereoscopic information in human visual cortex: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence.
    Skrandies W
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2001 Jul; 32(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11512379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Computational model of stereoscopic 3D visual saliency.
    Wang J; Da Silva MP; Le Callet P; Ricordel V
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jun; 22(6):2151-65. PubMed ID: 23412612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Toward an impairment metric for stereoscopic video: a full-reference video quality metric to assess compressed stereoscopic video.
    De Silva V; Arachchi HK; Ekmekcioglu E; Kondoz A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Sep; 22(9):3392-404. PubMed ID: 23771337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex.
    Parker AJ
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2007 May; 8(5):379-91. PubMed ID: 17453018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quality Assessment of DIBR-Synthesized Views Based on Sparsity of Difference of Closings and Difference of Gaussians.
    Sandic-Stankovic DD; Kukolj DD; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1161-1175. PubMed ID: 34990360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Colour helps to solve the binocular matching problem.
    den Ouden HE; van Ee R; de Haan EH
    J Physiol; 2005 Sep; 567(Pt 2):665-71. PubMed ID: 15975983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. M pathway and areas 44 and 45 are involved in stereoscopic recognition based on binocular disparity.
    Negawa T; Mizuno S; Hahashi T; Kuwata H; Tomida M; Hoshi H; Era S; Kuwata K
    Jpn J Physiol; 2002 Apr; 52(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 12139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN; Schlieski T; Selmins B; Cooper SC; Doherty RA; Corriveau PJ; Sheedy JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Zhang L; Mou X; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2378-86. PubMed ID: 21292594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Binocular coordination in response to two-dimensional, three-dimensional and stereoscopic visual stimuli.
    Blythe HI; Holliman NS; Jainta S; Tbaily LW; Liversedge SP
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):397-411. PubMed ID: 22775140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Synthesized Images Based on Visual-Entropy-Guided Multi-Layer Features Analysis.
    Jin C; Peng Z; Zou W; Chen F; Jiang G; Yu M
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Jun; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 34207229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stereopsis and binocular rivalry are based on perceived rather than physical orientations.
    Chopin A; Mamassian P; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 63():63-8. PubMed ID: 22609083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. DLNR-SIQA: Deep Learning-Based No-Reference Stitched Image Quality Assessment.
    Ullah H; Irfan M; Han K; Lee JW
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(22):. PubMed ID: 33198159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measuring 3D Video Quality of Experience (QoE) Using A Hybrid Metric Based on Spatial Resolution and Depth Cues.
    Coskun S; Nur Yilmaz G; Battisti F; Alhussein M; Islam S
    J Imaging; 2023 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 38132699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dynamic Receptive Field Generation for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Kim W; Nguyen AD; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 31995494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Medical Image Quality Assessment Using CSO Based Deep Neural Network.
    Jayageetha J; Vasanthanayaki C
    J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(11):224. PubMed ID: 30288616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Change in the Fusion Limit by Insertion of a Middle Image Equally Dividing the Parallactic Angle of 3D Stereoscopic Images].
    Uneme C; Kojima T; Sugiura A; Morita I; Miyao M
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2017; 72(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28154366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Human Brain in Depth: How We See in 3D.
    Welchman AE
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 2():345-376. PubMed ID: 28532360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.