537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35395344)
1. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.
Yavuz A; Büyükerkmen EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 37083917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling.
Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fatigue fracture resistance of titanium and chairside CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments supporting zirconia crowns: An in vitro comparative and finite element analysis study.
Giner S; Bartolomé JF; Gomez-Cogolludo P; Castellote C; Pradíes G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):503.e1-503.e9. PubMed ID: 33243472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Strength and Precision of Fit of Implant-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
Moilanen P; Hjerppe J; Lassila LVJ; Närhi TO
J Oral Implantol; 2018 Oct; 44(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 29763362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.
Ma R; Yu P; Zhang Y; Xie C; Tan X; Sun J; Yu H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 36161530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Different CAD/CAM Crown Materials on the Fracture of Custom-Made Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments After Artificial Aging.
Elsayed A; Farrag G; Chaar MS; Abdelnabi N; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 30677119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Screw Channel Angulation on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Garcia-Hammaker S; Saglik B; Sierraalta M; Razzoog M
J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):329-334. PubMed ID: 33170540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
