BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35395724)

  • 1. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.
    Reeve K; On BI; Havla J; Burns J; Gosteli-Peter MA; Alabsawi A; Alayash Z; Götschi A; Seibold H; Mansmann U; Held U
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 9(9):CD013606. PubMed ID: 37681561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review.
    Yang Q; Fan X; Cao X; Hao W; Lu J; Wei J; Tian J; Yin M; Ge L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36397723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.
    Collins GS; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Ma J; Hooft L; Reitsma JB; Logullo P; Beam AL; Peng L; Van Calster B; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Moons KG
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e048008. PubMed ID: 34244270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Navarro CA; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JA; Kirtley S; Hooft L; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():60-72. PubMed ID: 34214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAAG; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KG; Hooft L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038832. PubMed ID: 33177137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
    Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
    Diagn Progn Res; 2022 Jul; 6(1):13. PubMed ID: 35794668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: A systematic review.
    Kamel Rahimi A; Canfell OJ; Chan W; Sly B; Pole JD; Sullivan C; Shrapnel S
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 162():104758. PubMed ID: 35398812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Wynants L; Van Calster B; Collins GS; Riley RD; Heinze G; Schuit E; Bonten MMJ; Dahly DL; Damen JAA; Debray TPA; de Jong VMT; De Vos M; Dhiman P; Haller MC; Harhay MO; Henckaerts L; Heus P; Kammer M; Kreuzberger N; Lohmann A; Luijken K; Ma J; Martin GP; McLernon DJ; Andaur Navarro CL; Reitsma JB; Sergeant JC; Shi C; Skoetz N; Smits LJM; Snell KIE; Sperrin M; Spijker R; Steyerberg EW; Takada T; Tzoulaki I; van Kuijk SMJ; van Bussel B; van der Horst ICC; van Royen FS; Verbakel JY; Wallisch C; Wilkinson J; Wolff R; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
    BMJ; 2020 Apr; 369():m1328. PubMed ID: 32265220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35026997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
    BMJ; 2021 Oct; 375():n2281. PubMed ID: 34670780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome prediction models incorporating clinical variables for Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review of methodological conduct and risk of bias.
    Aly F; Hansen CR; Al Mouiee D; Sundaresan P; Haidar A; Vinod S; Holloway L
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109629. PubMed ID: 36934895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Vagliano I; Chesnaye NC; Leopold JH; Jager KJ; Abu-Hanna A; Schut MC
    Clin Kidney J; 2022 Dec; 15(12):2266-2280. PubMed ID: 36381375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multivariable prediction models for health care spending using machine learning: a protocol of a systematic review.
    Huang AW; Haslberger M; Coulibaly N; Galárraga O; Oganisian A; Belbasis L; Panagiotou OA
    Diagn Progn Res; 2022 Mar; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 35321760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
    Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic prediction models on patient reported outcome measurements after total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: a systematic review protocol.
    Chang WJ; Naylor J; Natarajan P; Liu V; Adie S
    Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 11(1):165. PubMed ID: 35948989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; van Smeden M; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 154():8-22. PubMed ID: 36436815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.