These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35396616)

  • 1. Patience is a virtue: Individual differences in cue-evoked pupil responses under temporal certainty.
    Hood AVB; Hart KM; Marchak FM; Hutchison KA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1286-1303. PubMed ID: 35396616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.
    Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 28639800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring task set preparation versus mind wandering using pupillometry.
    Hutchison KA; Moffitt CC; Hart K; Hood AVB; Watson JM; Marchak FM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):280-295. PubMed ID: 31219303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupillometry tracks fluctuations in working memory performance.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 30411207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory capacity does not always support future-oriented mind-wandering.
    McVay JC; Unsworth N; McMillan BD; Kane MJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 23458550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foggy windows: Pupillary responses during task preparation.
    Trani A; Verhaeghen P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2235-2248. PubMed ID: 30226439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relation between working memory capacity and the antisaccade task.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK; Miller AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1420-1447. PubMed ID: 34516206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A closer look at the timecourse of mind wandering: Pupillary responses and behaviour.
    Pelagatti C; Binda P; Vannucci M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0226792. PubMed ID: 32353028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance.
    Robison MK; Garner LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 38326632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in working memory capacity, attention control, fluid intelligence, and pupillary measures of arousal.
    Robison MK; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1296-1310. PubMed ID: 35389696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of working memory capacity and lapses of attention for variation in error monitoring.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 35426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.
    McVay JC; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):525-549. PubMed ID: 22004270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is There a Positive Association Between Working Memory Capacity and Mind Wandering in a Low-Demand Breathing Task? A Preregistered Replication of a Study by Levinson, Smallwood, and Davidson (2012).
    Meier ME
    Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 30(5):789-797. PubMed ID: 30901293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ocular working memory signals are flexible to behavioral priority and subjective imagery strength.
    Dong Y; Kiyonaga A
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Jul; 132(1):162-176. PubMed ID: 38836298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 18(4):638-664. PubMed ID: 29654476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive control in context: working memory capacity and proactive control.
    Redick TS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():1-9. PubMed ID: 24240136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):757-65. PubMed ID: 25324180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probing the neural signature of mind wandering with simultaneous fMRI-EEG and pupillometry.
    Groot JM; Boayue NM; Csifcsák G; Boekel W; Huster R; Forstmann BU; Mittner M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117412. PubMed ID: 33011417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of the pupillary response by the content of visual working memory.
    Zokaei N; Board AG; Manohar SG; Nobre AC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Nov; 116(45):22802-22810. PubMed ID: 31636213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.