These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35396864)
1. Comparison of health-related quality of life of women undergoing robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy for gynecologic conditions: A cross-sectional study. Kurt G; Guvenc G; Dede M; Yenen MC; Akyuz A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 159(2):583-591. PubMed ID: 35396864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning Needs of Women Who Undergo Robotic Versus Open Gynecologic Surgery. Kurt G; Loerzel VW; Hines RB; Tavasci K; Galura S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2018 Jul; 47(4):490-497. PubMed ID: 29750905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer. Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Gien LT; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Le T; Renkosinski B; Bernardini MQ Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29681461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of surgical approach and patient factors on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey scoring in gynecologic surgery. Wallace S; Hanson KT; Dowdy SC; Habermann EB Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 148(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 29221835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V; J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers. Zanagnolo V; Garbi A; Achilarre MT; Minig L J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):379-396. PubMed ID: 28104497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Doll KM; Barber EL; Bensen JT; Revilla MC; Snavely AC; Bennett AV; Reeve BB; Gehrig PA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):457.e1-457.e13. PubMed ID: 27131589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics. Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer. Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy]. Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction]. Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]