These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35396864)

  • 21. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Nezhat FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 19896593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mortality Rates in Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1253-1267.e4. PubMed ID: 31279137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gynecologic laparoscopy in patients aged 65 or more: feasibility and safety in the presence of increased comorbidity.
    Ciavattini A; Di Giuseppe J; Cecchi S; Tsiroglou D; Mancioli F; Stevenazzi G; Tranquilli AL; Litta P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Apr; 175():49-53. PubMed ID: 24456844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy.
    Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality of life in patients who undergo conventional or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Rodrigues RC; Rodrigues MRK; Freitas NO; Rudge MVC; Lima SAM
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15974. PubMed ID: 31169730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.
    Fornalik H; Zore T; Fornalik N; Foster T; Katschke A; Wright G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 29621128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
    Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The value of surgical admissions for malignant uterine cancer. A comparative analysis of robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy surgery in a university hospital.
    Specchia ML; Arcuri G; Di Pilla A; La Gatta E; Osti T; Limongelli P; Scambia G; Bellantone RDA
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():920578. PubMed ID: 36276379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exposure of Surgeons to Magnetic Fields during Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgeries.
    Park JS; Chung JW; Choi SB; Kim DW; Kim YT; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Cho HY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1247-51. PubMed ID: 26205574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Virtual postoperative visits following robotic gynecologic surgery: a study of patient satisfaction, safety, and feasibility.
    Mezes C; Klebanoff JS; Grebenyuk E; Gobern J; Meske SW; Amdur R; Moawad GN
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 35098446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
    Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of severe rectal prolapse].
    Li Z; Wang SH; Li GB; Lian YG; Gu XM; Xia KK; Yuan WT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 33353275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ovarian remnant syndrome: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
    Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Kho RM; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 22583107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of laparoscopy in older women undergoing gynecologic procedures: is it time to overcome initial concerns?
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Siesto G; Serati M; Bogani G; Sturla D; Bolis P
    Menopause; 2010; 17(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 19625984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Comparison of Survival and Recurrence Outcomes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Surgery.
    Park HK; Helenowski IB; Berry E; Lurain JR; Neubauer NL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 25922108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures.
    Unger CA; Lachiewicz MP; Ridgeway B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27591050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perioperative Recovery and Narcotic Use in Laparoscopic versus Robotic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.
    Crane EK; Brown J; Lehman A; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1898-1902. PubMed ID: 33965644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.