These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35397406)

  • 1. A stochastic approach to estimate intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal responses of the cornea.
    Yaghoubi V; Setayeshnasab H; Mosaddegh P; Kadkhodaei M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jun; 130():105210. PubMed ID: 35397406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element simulation of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery.
    Asejczyk-Widlicka M; Srodka W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():24-28. PubMed ID: 31677547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanics of the keratoconic cornea: Theory, segmentation, pressure distribution, and coupled FE-optimization algorithm.
    Rahmati SM; Razaghi R; Karimi A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jan; 113():104155. PubMed ID: 33125958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of corneal and fatty tissues biomechanical response in dynamic tonometry tests by using inverse models.
    Jannesari M; Kadkhodaei M; Mosaddegh P; Kasprzak H; Behrouz MJ
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 29658515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
    Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal pulsation and biomechanics during induced ocular pulse. An ex-vivo pilot study.
    Rogala MM; Lewandowski D; Detyna J; Antończyk A; Danielewska ME
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228920. PubMed ID: 32053692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a new intraocular pressure estimate for patients with soft corneas.
    Chen KJ; Eliasy A; Vinciguerra R; Abass A; Lopes BT; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 31326228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Using a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer in Healthy Eyes.
    Lee H; Kang DSY; Ha BJ; Choi JY; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Yonsei Med J; 2018 Nov; 59(9):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 30328327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature.
    Asaoka R; Nakakura S; Tabuchi H; Murata H; Nakao Y; Ihara N; Rimayanti U; Aihara M; Kiuchi Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140385. PubMed ID: 26485129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry.
    Joda AA; Shervin MM; Kook D; Elsheikh A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(9):943-53. PubMed ID: 27049961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Biomechanical properties of the cornea and tonometry measurements].
    Bubnova IA; Asatryan SV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2019; 135(4):27-32. PubMed ID: 31573554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus.
    Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 31779470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST.
    Eliasy A; Chen KJ; Vinciguerra R; Maklad O; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    Exp Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 175():98-102. PubMed ID: 29908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive finite element eye model for the compensation of biometric influences on acoustic tonometry.
    Osmers J; Kaiser N; Sorg M; Fischer A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105930. PubMed ID: 33486338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.
    Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.