249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35397494)
1. Significance of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis on genetic variances in noninbred and inbred populations.
Viana JMS; Garcia AAF
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 35397494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contribution of genetic effects to genetic variance components with epistasis and linkage disequilibrium.
Wang T; Zeng ZB
BMC Genet; 2009 Sep; 10():52. PubMed ID: 19732450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of epistasis in the heterosis and combining ability analyses.
Viana JMS
Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1168419. PubMed ID: 37143879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
Barton NH; Turelli M
Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.
González-Diéguez D; Legarra A; Charcosset A; Moreau L; Lehermeier C; Teyssèdre S; Vitezica ZG
Genetics; 2021 May; 218(1):. PubMed ID: 33864072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The additive genetic variance after bottlenecks is affected by the number of loci involved in epistatic interactions.
Naciri-Graven Y; Goudet J
Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12778542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimates of genetic variance in an F2 maize population.
Wolf DP; Peternelli LA; Hallauer AR
J Hered; 2000; 91(5):384-91. PubMed ID: 10994705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Models and partition of variance for quantitative trait loci with epistasis and linkage disequilibrium.
Wang T; Zeng ZB
BMC Genet; 2006 Feb; 7():9. PubMed ID: 16472377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epistasis and the temporal change in the additive variance-covariance matrix induced by drift.
López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1655-63. PubMed ID: 15446420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of epistasis on the excess of the additive and nonadditive variances after population bottlenecks.
López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
Evolution; 2002 May; 56(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 12093023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulation of quantitative characters from qualitatively acting genes : II. Orthogonal subdivision of hereditary variance in two-locus genetic systems.
Jana S
Theor Appl Genet; 1972 Jan; 42(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 24430832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components.
Cheverud JM; Routman EJ
Genetics; 1995 Mar; 139(3):1455-61. PubMed ID: 7768453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of recombination in the parent populations on the means and combining ability variances in hybrid populations of maize ( Zea mays L.).
Melchinger AE; Geiger HH; Utz HF; Schnell FW
Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Jan; 106(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 12582860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models.
Mäki-Tanila A; Hill WG
Genetics; 2014 Sep; 198(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 24990992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
