131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35397715)
1. In Vivo Changes in Dynamic Adjacent Segment Motion 1 Year After One and Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 50(7):871-881. PubMed ID: 35397715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal Study of the Six Degrees of Freedom Cervical Spine Range of Motion During Dynamic Flexion, Extension, and Rotation After Single-level Anterior Arthrodesis.
Anderst WJ; West T; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Nov; 41(22):E1319-E1327. PubMed ID: 27831986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of pathology and one-level versus two-level arthrodesis on cervical spine intervertebral helical axis of motion.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 133():110960. PubMed ID: 35074698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In Vivo Evidence of Early Instability and Late Stabilization in Motion Segments Immediately Superior to Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.
Chen SR; LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn S; Munsch MA; Couch BK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Sep; 47(17):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 35794796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.
Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.
Anderst W; Baillargeon E; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):E594-601. PubMed ID: 23429677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgery-related Factors Do Not Affect Short-term Adjacent Segment Kinematics After Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.
Chen SR; LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn S; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Dec; 46(23):1630-1636. PubMed ID: 33907081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 24210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical motion segment contributions to head motion during flexion\extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2538-43. PubMed ID: 26334229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):E533-9. PubMed ID: 23370681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.
Watanabe S; Inoue N; Yamaguchi T; Hirano Y; Espinoza Orías AA; Nishida S; Hirose Y; Mizuno J
Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):946-55. PubMed ID: 22124708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
