131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35397715)
21. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adjacent segment motion following multi-level ACDF: a kinematic and clinical study in patients with zero-profile anchored spacer or plate.
Cui W; Wu B; Liu B; Li D; Wang L; Ma S
Eur Spine J; 2019 Oct; 28(10):2408-2416. PubMed ID: 31428860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Ke W; Wang B; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chien A; Lai DM; Wang SF; Cheng CH; Hsu WL; Wang JL
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2857-65. PubMed ID: 25860996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
Auerbach JD; Anakwenze OA; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Total Disk Replacement Adjacent to a Multilevel Fusion in the Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Motion Analysis.
Segal DN; Grabel ZJ; Wilson JM; Milby AH; Shi WJ; Hutton WC; Rhee JM
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e881-e889. PubMed ID: 30391767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Zhang J; Chen W; Weng R; Liang D; Jiang X; Lin H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May; 24(1):407. PubMed ID: 37217909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Biomechanical study on the effect of the length of cervical anterior fusion on adjacent levels].
Yang J; Hai Y; Pang C; Li H; Zu D; Zhu G; Xia X; Pei B
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 52(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 25410783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Cervical Kinematics, Pain, and Functional Disability Between Single- and Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Chien A; Lai DM; Wang SF; Hsu WL; Cheng CH; Wang JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Aug; 41(15):E915-E922. PubMed ID: 26890952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion.
Prasarn ML; Baria D; Milne E; Latta L; Sukovich W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22136389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.
Shin DA; Yi S; Yoon DH; Kim KN; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 19444062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.
Kim SW; Limson MA; Kim SB; Arbatin JJ; Chang KY; Park MS; Shin JH; Ju YS
Eur Spine J; 2009 Feb; 18(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 19127374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intervertebral kinematics during neck motion 6.5 years after fusion and artificial disc replacement.
Yeni YN; Azad S; Oravec D; Schildcrout A; Basheer A; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Oct; 99():105756. PubMed ID: 36063742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
