These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 353985)
1. New rulebook for gene splicers faces one more test. Wade N Science; 1978 Aug; 201(4356):600-1. PubMed ID: 353985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA: let the public choose. Wright S Nature; 1978 Oct; 275(5680):468. PubMed ID: 692727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US proposes exemptions from DNA guidelines. Dickson D Nature; 1978 Aug; 274(5670):411. PubMed ID: 672968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH confirms violation of recombinant DNA research guidelines. Dickson D Nature; 1978 May; 273(5657):5. PubMed ID: 692667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. US extends recombinant DNA controls to private industry. Dickson D Nature; 1978 Dec 21-28; 276(5690):744. PubMed ID: 723950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of the NIH guidelines. Milewski EA Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1981 Dec; 4(4):160-5. PubMed ID: 7029672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US to increase public participation in regulation of DNA research. Dickson D Nature; 1978 Nov; 276(5687):430. PubMed ID: 723919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The recombinant DNA scenarios: Andromeda strain, chimera, and Golem. Davis BD Am Sci; 1977; 65(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 334004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US drug companies push for changes in recombinant DNA guidelines. Dickson D Nature; 1979 Mar; 278(5703):385-6. PubMed ID: 450039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. MSU faults Strobel for Dutch elm test. Roberts L Science; 1987 Sep; 237(4820):1286. PubMed ID: 3629239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New questions in Strobel case. Roberts L Science; 1987 Sep; 237(4819):1097-8. PubMed ID: 3306915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recombinant DNA research: beyond the NIH guidelines. Grobstein C Science; 1976 Dec; 194(4270):1133-5. PubMed ID: 1069374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US expected to exempt most recombinant DNA experiments from federal regulation. Nature; 1979 Sep; 281(5727):90. PubMed ID: 471066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The revised "Points to Consider" document. Hum Gene Ther; 1990; 1(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 2081190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Public regulation of recombinant dna gene therapy. McGarity TO; Shapiro SA J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):185-210. PubMed ID: 6981676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health. Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Minutes of meeting, January 30, 1989. Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1989 Jun; 12(2):69-134. PubMed ID: 2595015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation. Talbot B Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene-splicers battle over potato field. Heneson N New Sci; 1983 Sep; 99(1376):831. PubMed ID: 11655566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Petition to amend the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules to establish a Public Policy Advisory Committee. Foundation on Economic Trends, September 18, 1990. Hum Gene Ther; 1991; 2(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 1911933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]