These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35399871)
1. Growth patterns and shape development of the paediatric mandible - A 3D statistical model. O' Sullivan E; van de Lande LS; El Ghoul K; Koudstaal MJ; Schievano S; Khonsari RH; Dunaway DJ; Zafeiriou S Bone Rep; 2022 Jun; 16():101528. PubMed ID: 35399871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 3D skull 0-4 years: A validated, generative, statistical shape model. O' Sullivan E; van de Lande LS; Oosting AC; Papaioannou A; Jeelani NO; Koudstaal MJ; Khonsari RH; Dunaway DJ; Zafeiriou S; Schievano S Bone Rep; 2021 Dec; 15():101154. PubMed ID: 34917697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hyoid bone morphology in patients with isolated robin sequence - A case-control study utilizing 3D morphable models. Van Den Berg CPOM; El Ghoul K; O'Sullivan E; Guntaka PK; Resnick CM; Pullens B; Khonsari RH; Dunaway DJ; Wolvius EB; Van de Lande LS; Koudstaal MJ Bone Rep; 2024 Mar; 20():101738. PubMed ID: 38292932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of 3D statistical mandible models for cephalometric measurements. Kim SG; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ; Choi SC; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Kim TI; Hong H; Yoo JH Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Sep; 42(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 23071968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Size and shape of human mandible: Sex differences and influence of age on sex estimation accuracy. Toneva DH; Nikolova SY; Fileva NF; Zlatareva DK Leg Med (Tokyo); 2023 Nov; 65():102322. PubMed ID: 37722156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A three-dimensional statistical shape model of the growing mandible. Klop C; Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18843. PubMed ID: 34552162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models. Raith S; Wolff S; Steiner T; Modabber A; Weber M; Hölzle F; Fischer H Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 27393280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shape variation and sex differences of the adult human mandible evaluated by geometric morphometrics. Chalazoniti A; Lattanzi W; Halazonetis DJ Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8546. PubMed ID: 38609399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling. Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling growth curves of the normal infant's mandible: 3D measurements using computed tomography. Schipper JAM; van Lieshout MJS; Böhringer S; Padwa BL; Robben SGF; van Rijn RR; Koudstaal MJ; Lequin MH; Wolvius EB Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6365-6375. PubMed ID: 33864148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphological Variation of the Mandible in the Orthognathic Population-A Morphological Study Using Statistical Shape Modelling. van der Wel H; Qiu B; Spijkervet FKL; Jansma J; Schepers RH; Kraeima J J Pers Med; 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37241024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Craniofacial shape from pre- to post-adolescence. Maciejewska-Turek A; Bilińska M; Wellens HLL; Fudalej PS Eur J Orthod; 2022 May; 44(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 34458910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cranial growth in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared with normal growth in the first 6 months of age. Mercan E; Hopper RA; Maga AM J Anat; 2020 Jan; 236(1):105-116. PubMed ID: 31691965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of the mandible from partial inputs for virtual surgery planning. Gillingham RL; Mutsvangwa TEM; van der Merwe J Med Eng Phys; 2023 Jan; 111():103934. PubMed ID: 36792246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterizing mandibular growth using three-dimensional imaging techniques and anatomic landmarks. Kelly MP; Vorperian HK; Wang Y; Tillman KK; Werner HM; Chung MK; Gentry LR Arch Oral Biol; 2017 May; 77():27-38. PubMed ID: 28161602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An automated landmark method to describe geometric changes in the human mandible during growth. Fournier G; Maret D; Telmon N; Savall F Arch Oral Biol; 2023 May; 149():105663. PubMed ID: 36893681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Describing the mandible in patients with craniofacial microsomia based on principal component analysis and thin plate spline video analysis. Kaya O; Pluijmers BI; Staal F; Ruff C; Padwa BL; Koudstaal MJ; Dunaway DJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 48(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 30228004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects. Paoloni V; Lione R; Farisco F; Halazonetis DJ; Franchi L; Cozza P Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):371-376. PubMed ID: 28340178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examination of new parameters for sex determination of mandible using Japanese computer tomography data. Suzuki K; Nakano H; Inoue K; Nakajima Y; Mizobuchi S; Omori M; Kato-Kogoe N; Mishima K; Ueno T Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Jul; 49(5):20190282. PubMed ID: 31821020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ontogenetic insights into the significance of mandibular corpus shape variation in hominoids: Developmental covariation between M Pitirri MK; Begun D Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Jan; 171(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 31710703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]