These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35401267)

  • 1. Nonlinear Probability Weighting in Depression and Anxiety: Insights From Healthy Young Adults.
    Hagiwara K; Mochizuki Y; Chen C; Lei H; Hirotsu M; Matsubara T; Nakagawa S
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():810867. PubMed ID: 35401267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational markers of experience- but not description-based decision-making are associated with future depressive symptoms in young adults.
    Chen C; Mochizuki Y; Hagiwara K; Hirotsu M; Matsubara T; Nakagawa S
    J Psychiatr Res; 2022 Oct; 154():307-314. PubMed ID: 35973300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of positive autobiographical memory retrieval on decision-making under risk: A computational model-based analysis.
    Shimizu N; Mochizuki Y; Chen C; Hagiwara K; Matsumoto K; Oda Y; Hirotsu M; Okabe E; Matsubara T; Nakagawa S
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():930466. PubMed ID: 36147987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a computational understanding of how reminiscing about positive autobiographical memories influences decision-making under risk.
    Watarai M; Hagiwara K; Mochizuki Y; Chen C; Mizumoto T; Kawashima C; Koga T; Okabe E; Nakagawa S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Oct; 23(5):1365-1373. PubMed ID: 37380917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anxiety, Depression, and Decision Making: A Computational Perspective.
    Bishop SJ; Gagne C
    Annu Rev Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 41():371-388. PubMed ID: 29709209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reward and avoidance learning in the context of aversive environments and possible implications for depressive symptoms.
    Sebold M; Garbusow M; Jetzschmann P; Schad DJ; Nebe S; Schlagenhauf F; Heinz A; Rapp M; Romanczuk-Seiferth N
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2437-2449. PubMed ID: 31254091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis.
    Van Houtven G; Johnson FR; Kilambi V; Hauber AB
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):469-80. PubMed ID: 21310854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):949-975. PubMed ID: 34370495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychiatric symptoms influence reward-seeking and loss-avoidance decision-making through common and distinct computational processes.
    Suzuki S; Yamashita Y; Katahira K
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 75(9):277-285. PubMed ID: 34151477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the shape of the probability weighting function.
    Gonzalez R; Wu G
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):129-66. PubMed ID: 10090801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual Differences in Subjective Utility and Risk Preferences: The Influence of Hedonic Capacity and Trait Anxiety.
    Howlett JR; Paulus MP
    Front Psychiatry; 2017; 8():88. PubMed ID: 28588508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities.
    Hsu M; Krajbich I; Zhao C; Camerer CF
    J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(7):2231-7. PubMed ID: 19228976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the distortion of probability information in decision under risk and an equivalent visual task.
    Glaser C; Trommershäuser J; Mamassian P; Maloney LT
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Apr; 23(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 22395127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105441. PubMed ID: 37058827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making.
    Harlé KM; Guo D; Zhang S; Paulus MP; Yu AJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186473. PubMed ID: 29059254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Substance use, affective problems and personality traits: test of two association models].
    Chakroun N; Doron J; Swendsen J
    Encephale; 2004; 30(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 15738859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.
    Cerbo AD
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2021; 32(4):293-295. PubMed ID: 34964106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elevated Effort Cost Identified by Computational Modeling as a Distinctive Feature Explaining Multiple Behaviors in Patients With Depression.
    Vinckier F; Jaffre C; Gauthier C; Smajda S; Abdel-Ahad P; Le Bouc R; Daunizeau J; Fefeu M; Borderies N; Plaze M; Gaillard R; Pessiglione M
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2022 Nov; 7(11):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 35952972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.