These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35401306)

  • 21. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
    Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictability eliminates neighborhood effects during Chinese sentence reading.
    Yao P; Staub A; Li X
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):243-252. PubMed ID: 34258731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Getting ahead of yourself: Parafoveal word expectancy modulates the N400 during sentence reading.
    Stites MC; Payne BR; Federmeier KD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):475-490. PubMed ID: 28101830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The graded predictive pre-activation in Chinese sentence reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Chang M; Zhang K; Sun Y; Li S; Wang J
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1136488. PubMed ID: 37457059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Semantic constraint, reading control, and the granularity of form-based expectations during semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs.
    Bulkes NZ; Christianson K; Tanner D
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107294. PubMed ID: 31821830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Additive effects of repetition and predictability during comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Chow WY; Lago S; Barrios S; Parker D; Morini G; Lau E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99199. PubMed ID: 24905459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semantic preview benefit and cost: Evidence from parafoveal fast-priming paradigm.
    Pan J; Yan M; Laubrock J
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104452. PubMed ID: 32971508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
    Luke SG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word-Initial Letters Influence Fixation Durations during Fluent Reading.
    Hand CJ; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():85. PubMed ID: 22485100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.
    Carter GA; Hoffman P
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.
    Huizeling E; Arana S; Hagoort P; Schoffelen JM
    Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2022; 3(1):149-179. PubMed ID: 37215333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parafoveal preview during reading: effects of sentence position.
    White SJ; Warren T; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1221-38. PubMed ID: 21500948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M; McLean HH; McCreery R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences.
    Connolly JF; Stewart SH; Phillips NA
    Brain Lang; 1990 Aug; 39(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 2224497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic feature activation takes time: longer SOA elicits earlier priming effects during reading.
    Hofmann MJ; Kleemann MA; Roelke-Wellmann A; Vorstius C; Radach R
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 35254545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural Correlates of Semantic Prediction and Resolution in Sentence Processing.
    Grisoni L; Miller TM; Pulvermüller F
    J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(18):4848-4858. PubMed ID: 28411271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de () in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Zhang M; Bai X; Yan G; Angele B; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 27998212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.