These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35403761)

  • 1. Recommendations for reporting statistical results when comparing proportions.
    Vrbin CM
    Cytopathology; 2022 May; 33(3):301-304. PubMed ID: 35403761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parametric or nonparametric statistical tests: Considerations when choosing the most appropriate option for your data.
    Vrbin CM
    Cytopathology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 36017662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations for reporting measures of diagnostic accuracy.
    Vrbin CM
    Cytopathology; 2023 May; 34(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 36648307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing statistical tests: part 12 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
    du Prel JB; Röhrig B; Hommel G; Blettner M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 May; 107(19):343-8. PubMed ID: 20532129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Is it necessary to have advanced statistical knowledge to access medical literacy?].
    Chiapella LC; Lazzarini CL; Montenegro SM
    Medicina (B Aires); 2019; 79(6):445-452. PubMed ID: 31829946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can't miss: conquer any number task by making important statistics simple. Part 6. Tests of statistical significance (z test statistic, rejecting the null hypothesis, p value), t test, z test for proportions, statistical significance versus meaningful difference.
    Hansen JP
    J Healthc Qual; 2004; 26(4):43-53. PubMed ID: 15352344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power of testing proportions in small two-sample studies when sample sizes are equal.
    Davis AB
    Stat Med; 1993 Apr; 12(8):777-87. PubMed ID: 8516594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in burns research.
    Al-Benna S; Al-Ajam Y; Way B; Steinstraesser L
    Burns; 2010 May; 36(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 19541424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Description and reporting of surgical data--scope for improvement?
    Robinson PM; Menakuru S; Reed MW; Balasubramanian SP
    Surgeon; 2009 Feb; 7(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19241978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting quality of multivariable logistic regression in selected Indian medical journals.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A; Chhabra P
    J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22718056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals that match Fisher's exact or Blaker's exact tests.
    Fay MP
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):373-4. PubMed ID: 19948745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in Cytopathology Studies: Review of 6 Journals.
    Bahar B; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA; Akdas Y
    Lab Med; 2019 Jan; 50(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 30020520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Emadi A; Chua JV; Talwani R; Bentzen SM; Baddley J
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):897. PubMed ID: 33115543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions.
    Mehrotra DV; Chan IS; Berger RL
    Biometrics; 2003 Jun; 59(2):441-50. PubMed ID: 12926729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple statistical measures for analyzing categorical data.
    Humble CG
    J Healthc Qual; 1994; 16(5):30-6. PubMed ID: 10136705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.