BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35403978)

  • 1. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with side-to-side semi-mechanical anastomosis: analysis of a learning curve.
    Rebecchi F; Bonomo LD; Salzano A; Camandona M; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 35403978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
    Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
    Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
    de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
    Müller DT; Brunner S; Straatman J; Babic B; Eckhoff JA; Reisewitz A; Storms C; Schiffmann LM; Schmidt T; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7305-7316. PubMed ID: 37580580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A structured training pathway to implement robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the learning curve results from a high-volume center.
    Kingma BF; Hadzijusufovic E; Van der Sluis PC; Bano E; Lang H; Ruurda JP; Hillegersberg van R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
    van der Sluis PC; van Hillegersberg R
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 36-37():81-83. PubMed ID: 30551860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).
    van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
    Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
    Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
    Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; Verhage RJ; van der Horst S; Haverkamp L; Siersema PD; Borel Rinkes IH; Ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S1350-6. PubMed ID: 26023036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.