These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35403978)
1. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with side-to-side semi-mechanical anastomosis: analysis of a learning curve. Rebecchi F; Bonomo LD; Salzano A; Camandona M; Morino M Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 35403978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial. Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study. Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center. de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). Müller DT; Brunner S; Straatman J; Babic B; Eckhoff JA; Reisewitz A; Storms C; Schiffmann LM; Schmidt T; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7305-7316. PubMed ID: 37580580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy. van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A structured training pathway to implement robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the learning curve results from a high-volume center. Kingma BF; Hadzijusufovic E; Van der Sluis PC; Bano E; Lang H; Ruurda JP; Hillegersberg van R; Grimminger PP Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer. van der Sluis PC; van Hillegersberg R Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 36-37():81-83. PubMed ID: 30551860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience). van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results. Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome. Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF; Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer. van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; Verhage RJ; van der Horst S; Haverkamp L; Siersema PD; Borel Rinkes IH; Ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S1350-6. PubMed ID: 26023036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes. Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study. Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]