These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35404627)

  • 1. Reconsideration of the type I error rate for psychological science in the era of replication.
    Carlin MT; Costello MS; Flansburg MA; Darden A
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 35404627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
    Kenny DA; Judd CM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Jorgensen TD; Kite BA; Chen PY; Short SD
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):708-728. PubMed ID: 29172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors.
    Gelman A; Carlin J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 26186114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):127-139. PubMed ID: 33617275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
    Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary applications of moderation analysis in counseling psychology.
    Lorah JA; Wong YJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2018 Oct; 65(5):629-640. PubMed ID: 30010352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale.
    Lieberman MD; Cunningham WA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 4(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 20035017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using generalizability theory with continuous latent response variables.
    Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):153-178. PubMed ID: 30080056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling.
    Schuurman NK; Hamaker EL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):70-91. PubMed ID: 30188157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A cautionary tale on treating measurement error.
    Zhang Q
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):308-330. PubMed ID: 35604700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reversing Bonferroni.
    Francis G; Thunell E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):788-794. PubMed ID: 33464549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
    Moreau D; Corballis MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.
    Belzak WCM; Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 31916799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is replication possible without fidelity?
    Ellefson MR; Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 35049324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.