These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35404639)

  • 1. Finding the perfect match: Fingerprint expertise facilitates statistical learning and visual comparison decision-making.
    Growns B; Mattijssen EJAT; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Cole SA; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):386-397. PubMed ID: 35404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic feature-comparison expertise: Statistical learning facilitates visual comparison performance.
    Growns B; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Sep; 26(3):493-506. PubMed ID: 32150438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the frequency of general fingerprint patterns by fingerprint examiners and novices.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110347. PubMed ID: 32512413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners.
    Growns B; Towler A; Dunn JD; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Dror IE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 35841470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise.
    Growns B; Martire KA
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():148-153. PubMed ID: 32490372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class.
    Searston RA; Tangen JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178403. PubMed ID: 28574998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of fingerprint expertise on visual short-term memory.
    Corbett BJ; Tangen JM; Searston RA; Thompson MB
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Mar; 9(1):14. PubMed ID: 38502299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of expertise, target usefulness and image structure on visual search.
    Robson SG; Tangen JM; Searston RA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 33709197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are forensic scientists too risk averse?
    Mannering WM; Vogelsang MD; Busey TA; Mannering FL
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1377-1400. PubMed ID: 33748945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of ordinal outcomes in forensic black-box studies.
    Arora HM; Kaplan-Damary N; Stern HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111909. PubMed ID: 38104395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training perceptual experts: Feedback, labels, and contrasts.
    Searston RA; Tangen JM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 28252995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.