122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35405013)
1. The Influence of Cement Removal Techniques on In Situ Bacterial Adhesion and Biodegradation at the Marginal Interface of Ceramic Laminates.
de Brito O; Sandes JM; de Lima F; Oliveira JB; Alves LC; Brayner FA; de Melo Monteiro GQ
Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 35405013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacterial Colonization in the Marginal Region of Ceramic Restorations: Effects of Different Cement Removal Methods and Polishing.
Pereira S; Anami LC; Pereira CA; Souza R; Kantorski KZ; Bottino MA; Jorge A; Valandro LF
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):642-654. PubMed ID: 27820691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques.
Anami LC; Pereira CA; Guerra E; Assunção e Souza RO; Jorge AO; Bottino MA
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
St Germain HA; Meiers JC
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW
J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials.
Bayrak GD; Sandalli N; Selvi-Kuvvetli S; Topcuoglu N; Kulekci G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Nov; 29(6):424-434. PubMed ID: 28618104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
Turker SB; Biskin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of Surface Roughness, Fracture Toughness, and Weibull Characteristics of Different Framework-Veneer Dental Ceramic Assemblies after Grinding, Polishing, and Glazing.
Pradíes G; Godoy-Ruiz L; Özcan M; Moreno-Hay I; Martínez-Rus F
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 29144007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cement type, excess removal, and polishing on the cement joint.
Beierlein G; Haas L; Hahnel S; Schmidt M; Rosentritt M
Quintessence Int; 2024 Feb; 55(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 38108419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of alternative adhesive cementation concepts for zirconia ceramic: glaze layer vs zirconia primer.
Cura C; Özcan M; Isik G; Saracoglu A
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Feb; 14(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 21594233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
