BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35405331)

  • 1. Thirty-day Postoperative Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive versus Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
    Kohut AY; Kuhn T; Conrad LB; Chua KJ; Abuelafiya M; Gordon AN; Flowers L; Orfanelli T; Blank S; Khanna N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):840-847. PubMed ID: 35405331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.
    Vázquez-Vicente D; Boria F; Castellanos T; Gutierrez M; Chacon E; Manzour N; Minguez JA; Martin-Calvo N; Alcazar JL; Chiva L;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 Feb; 34(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 38669163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice patterns and complications of hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial.
    Schivardi G; Casarin J; Habermann EB; Bews KA; Langstraat CL; Cliby W; Cucinella G; De Vitis LA; Ramirez PT; Aletti GD; Mariani A; Multinu F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 230(1):69.e1-69.e10. PubMed ID: 37690596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Mercadel AJ; Holloway SB; Saripella M; Lea JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 228(6):718.e1-718.e7. PubMed ID: 36863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis.
    Di Donato V; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Falcone F; Petrillo M; Capobianco G; Calò F; D'Augè TG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Ervas E; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F; Sopracordevole F; Vizza E; Giannini A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():49-54. PubMed ID: 37149905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of annualized surgeon volume on major surgical complications for abdominal and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016: a retrospective cohort study.
    Liang C; Li W; Liu X; Zhao H; Yin L; Li M; Guo Y; Lang J; Bin X; Liu P; Chen C
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):69. PubMed ID: 36793026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang S; Wang S; Lv A; Huang S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1497-502. PubMed ID: 27400320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regarding "30-day Postoperative Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive versus Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer".
    Bogani G; Golia D'Auge T; Muzii L; Panici PB; Di Donato V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):164. PubMed ID: 36442751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.
    Roy M; Plante M; Renaud MC; Têtu B
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 8812529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.