129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35405530)
21. Scalable relevance ranking algorithm via semantic similarity assessment improves efficiency of medical chart review.
Cai T; He Z; Hong C; Zhang Y; Ho YL; Honerlaw J; Geva A; Ayakulangara Panickan V; King A; Gagnon DR; Gaziano M; Cho K; Liao K; Cai T
J Biomed Inform; 2022 Aug; 132():104109. PubMed ID: 35660521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unsupervised ensemble ranking of terms in electronic health record notes based on their importance to patients.
Chen J; Yu H
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Apr; 68():121-131. PubMed ID: 28267590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Machine learning and word sense disambiguation in the biomedical domain: design and evaluation issues.
Xu H; Markatou M; Dimova R; Liu H; Friedman C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():334. PubMed ID: 16822321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Preliminary Study of Clinical Abbreviation Disambiguation in Real Time.
Wu Y; Denny JC; Rosenbloom ST; Miller RA; Giuse DA; Song M; Xu H
Appl Clin Inform; 2015; 6(2):364-74. PubMed ID: 26171081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A deep database of medical abbreviations and acronyms for natural language processing.
Grossman Liu L; Grossman RH; Mitchell EG; Weng C; Natarajan K; Hripcsak G; Vawdrey DK
Sci Data; 2021 Jun; 8(1):149. PubMed ID: 34078918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combining corpus-derived sense profiles with estimated frequency information to disambiguate clinical abbreviations.
Xu H; Stetson PD; Friedman C
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():1004-13. PubMed ID: 23304376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical Text Data in Machine Learning: Systematic Review.
Spasic I; Nenadic G
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e17984. PubMed ID: 32229465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.
Sheikhalishahi S; Miotto R; Dudley JT; Lavelli A; Rinaldi F; Osmani V
JMIR Med Inform; 2019 Apr; 7(2):e12239. PubMed ID: 31066697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A long journey to short abbreviations: developing an open-source framework for clinical abbreviation recognition and disambiguation (CARD).
Wu Y; Denny JC; Trent Rosenbloom S; Miller RA; Giuse DA; Wang L; Blanquicett C; Soysal E; Xu J; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e79-e86. PubMed ID: 27539197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ensembles of natural language processing systems for portable phenotyping solutions.
Liu C; Ta CN; Rogers JR; Li Z; Lee J; Butler AM; Shang N; Kury FSP; Wang L; Shen F; Liu H; Ena L; Friedman C; Weng C
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Dec; 100():103318. PubMed ID: 31655273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Text de-identification for privacy protection: a study of its impact on clinical text information content.
Meystre SM; Ferrández Ó; Friedlin FJ; South BR; Shen S; Samore MH
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Aug; 50():142-50. PubMed ID: 24502938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. deepBioWSD: effective deep neural word sense disambiguation of biomedical text data.
Pesaranghader A; Matwin S; Sokolova M; Pesaranghader A
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 May; 26(5):438-446. PubMed ID: 30811548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Word embeddings and recurrent neural networks based on Long-Short Term Memory nodes in supervised biomedical word sense disambiguation.
Jimeno Yepes A
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Sep; 73():137-147. PubMed ID: 28797709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identifying Goals of Care Conversations in the Electronic Health Record Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.
Lee RY; Brumback LC; Lober WB; Sibley J; Nielsen EL; Treece PD; Kross EK; Loggers ET; Fausto JA; Lindvall C; Engelberg RA; Curtis JR
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2021 Jan; 61(1):136-142.e2. PubMed ID: 32858164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mining fall-related information in clinical notes: Comparison of rule-based and novel word embedding-based machine learning approaches.
Topaz M; Murga L; Gaddis KM; McDonald MV; Bar-Bachar O; Goldberg Y; Bowles KH
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Feb; 90():103103. PubMed ID: 30639392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Applying active learning to high-throughput phenotyping algorithms for electronic health records data.
Chen Y; Carroll RJ; Hinz ER; Shah A; Eyler AE; Denny JC; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Dec; 20(e2):e253-9. PubMed ID: 23851443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feature extraction for phenotyping from semantic and knowledge resources.
Ning W; Chan S; Beam A; Yu M; Geva A; Liao K; Mullen M; Mandl KD; Kohane I; Cai T; Yu S
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Mar; 91():103122. PubMed ID: 30738949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing Natural Language Processing and Structured Medical Data to Develop a Computable Phenotype for Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19: Retrospective Analysis.
Chang F; Krishnan J; Hurst JH; Yarrington ME; Anderson DJ; O'Brien EC; Goldstein BA
JMIR Med Inform; 2023 Aug; 11():e46267. PubMed ID: 37621195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Extraction of Information Related to Drug Safety Surveillance From Electronic Health Record Notes: Joint Modeling of Entities and Relations Using Knowledge-Aware Neural Attentive Models.
Dandala B; Joopudi V; Tsou CH; Liang JJ; Suryanarayanan P
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e18417. PubMed ID: 32459650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]