BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35405734)

  • 1. Correlating Quantitative Para-Aortic Lymph Node Computed Tomography Parameters With Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Cervical Cancer Staging: Possible Solution for Resource Constrained Countries.
    D'Cunha P; Albuquerque K; Xi Y; Pinho DF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):551-559. PubMed ID: 35405734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with
    Lin AJ; Wright JD; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Thaker PH; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 31473660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomic distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose-avid para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.
    Takiar V; Fontanilla HP; Eifel PJ; Jhingran A; Kelly P; Iyer RB; Levenback CF; Zhang Y; Dong L; Klopp A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(4):1045-50. PubMed ID: 23332221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings.
    Lin WC; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Kao CH; Yen RF; Shen YY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Apr; 89(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 12694656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Value of Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Node-Negative Endometrial Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Park JY; Lee JJ; Choi HJ; Song IH; Sung CO; Kim HO; Chae SY; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):2303-2310. PubMed ID: 28550488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of pre-operative 18-fluoride fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in predicting lymph node involvement in colon cancer.
    Gauci CM; Kim TJ; Gao Y; Perera DS
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Nov; 93(11):2675-2679. PubMed ID: 37530228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A multiparametric PET-CT study.
    Li K; Sun H; Guo Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():153-157. PubMed ID: 30927941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and sentinel node biopsy in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective observational study.
    Tanaka T; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(38):e12522. PubMed ID: 30235772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [
    Adam JA; van Diepen PR; Mom CH; Stoker J; van Eck-Smit BLF; Bipat S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):588-596. PubMed ID: 32921477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Value of
    Voskuilen CS; Schweitzer D; Jensen JB; Nielsen AM; Joniau S; Muilwijk T; Necchi A; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Briganti A; Bandini M; Goffin K; Bouchelouche K; van Werkhoven E; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Azawi NH; Ku JH; Foerster B; van Rhijn BWG; Vegt E; Hendricksen K
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 31591037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging evaluation of para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.
    Zhu M; Zhuo Q; Liu W; Guan C; Zuo Y
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Sep; 64(9):2611-2617. PubMed ID: 37321631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-Energy CT-Derived Electron Density for Diagnosing Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison With Conventional CT and FDG PET/CT Findings.
    Nagano H; Takumi K; Nakajo M; Fukukura Y; Kumagae Y; Jinguji M; Tani A; Yoshiura T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 34319164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which is better for predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography or a sentinel node biopsy? A retrospective observational study.
    Tanaka T; Sasaki S; Tsuchihashi H; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0410. PubMed ID: 29668599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the accuracy of
    Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histologic results of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical cancer with negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the para-aortic area.
    Boughanim M; Leboulleux S; Rey A; Pham CT; Zafrani Y; Duvillard P; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Schlumberger M; Morice P
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2558-61. PubMed ID: 18487573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative accuracy of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in detection of lymph node metastasis from anal cancer.
    Chulroek T; Kordbacheh H; Wangcharoenrung D; Cattapan K; Heidari P; Harisinghani MG
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):828-835. PubMed ID: 30694369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tumour and pelvic lymph node metabolic activity on FDG-PET/CT to stratify patients for para-aortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Martinez A; Voglimacci M; Lusque A; Ducassou A; Gladieff L; Dupuis N; Angeles MA; Martinez C; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Chantalat E; Hitzel A; Courbon F; Ferron G; Gabiache E
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 31915897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of distant metastatic disease by positron emission tomography with
    Lin A; Ma S; Dehdashti F; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Siegel B; Powell M; Grigsby P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):487-491. PubMed ID: 30739082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of
    Isaji Y; Tsuyoshi H; Tsujikawa T; Orisaka M; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):18864. PubMed ID: 37914892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative
    Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):2031-2037. PubMed ID: 29218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.