BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35407008)

  • 1. Meating Conflict: Toward a Model of Ambivalence-Motivated Reduction of Meat Consumption.
    Pauer S; Rutjens BT; Ruby MB; Perino G; van Harreveld F
    Foods; 2022 Mar; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 35407008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the meat paradox: How ambivalence towards meat influences moral disengagement.
    Buttlar B; Walther E
    Appetite; 2018 Sep; 128():152-158. PubMed ID: 29885387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: introducing the MAID model.
    van Harreveld F; van der Pligt J; de Liver YN
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Feb; 13(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19144904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambivalence towards meat.
    Berndsen M; van der Pligt J
    Appetite; 2004 Feb; 42(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15036785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Structuralistic and meta-psychological approaches to ambivalence in schizophrenia].
    Sumida K; Tsuda H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(8):1037-44. PubMed ID: 14577287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Escaping from the meat paradox: How morality and disgust affect meat-related ambivalence.
    Buttlar B; Walther E
    Appetite; 2022 Jan; 168():105721. PubMed ID: 34606940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making More Sustainable Food Choices One Meal at a Time: Psychological and Practical Aspects of Meat Reduction and Substitution.
    Collier ES; Normann A; Harris KL; Oberrauter LM; Bergman P
    Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35563904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: an exploration in the domain of food choice.
    Sparks P; Conner M; James R; Shepherd R; Povey R
    Br J Health Psychol; 2001 Feb; 6(Pt 1):53-68. PubMed ID: 14596738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals.
    Rothgerber H
    Appetite; 2020 Mar; 146():104511. PubMed ID: 31707073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The good and bad of ambivalence: Desiring ambivalence under outcome uncertainty.
    Reich T; Wheeler SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Apr; 110(4):493-508. PubMed ID: 27078506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ambivalence and Interpersonal Liking: The Expression of Ambivalence as Social Validation of Attitudinal Conflict.
    Toribio-Flórez D; van Harreveld F; Schneider IK
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():525301. PubMed ID: 33132947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Investigation of Meat Eating in Samples from Australia and Germany: The Role of Justifications, Perceptions, and Empathy.
    Northrope K; Howell T; Kashima ES; Buttlar B; Sproesser G; Ruby MB
    Animals (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38254380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feeling conflicted and seeking information: when ambivalence enhances and diminishes selective exposure to attitude-consistent information.
    Sawicki V; Wegener DT; Clark JK; Fabrigar LR; Smith SM; Durso GR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):735-47. PubMed ID: 23482502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Fabrigar LR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18340037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambivalence toward healthy and unhealthy food and moderation by individual differences in restrained eating.
    Norris CJ; Do E; Close E; Deswert S
    Appetite; 2019 Sep; 140():309-317. PubMed ID: 31136805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dealing with the meat paradox: Threat leads to moral disengagement from meat consumption.
    Buttlar B; Walther E
    Appetite; 2019 Jun; 137():73-80. PubMed ID: 30825492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robocalypse? Yes, Please! The Role of Robot Autonomy in the Development of Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Robots.
    Stapels JG; Eyssel F
    Int J Soc Robot; 2022; 14(3):683-697. PubMed ID: 34413912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds.
    Leach S; Piazza J; Loughnan S; Sutton RM; Kapantai I; Dhont K; Douglas KM
    Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105935. PubMed ID: 35045324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence.
    Weng J; DeMarree KG
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():854. PubMed ID: 31068857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive, negative, or all relative? Evaluative conditioning of ambivalence.
    Glaser T; Woud ML; Labib Iskander M; Schmalenstroth V; Vo TM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():155-165. PubMed ID: 29482089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.