These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35408326)

  • 1. Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics-Part 2: Accuracy.
    Pagnon D; Domalain M; Reveret L
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics-Part 1: Robustness.
    Pagnon D; Domalain M; Reveret L
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(19):. PubMed ID: 34640862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of validity of gait analysis systems during treadmill walking and running using human pose tracking algorithm.
    Ota M; Tateuchi H; Hashiguchi T; Ichihashi N
    Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():290-297. PubMed ID: 33636458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development and evaluation of a fully automated markerless motion capture workflow.
    Needham L; Evans M; Wade L; Cosker DP; McGuigan MP; Bilzon JL; Colyer SL
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111338. PubMed ID: 36252308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of OpenCap: A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks.
    Turner JA; Chaaban CR; Padua DA
    J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 171():112200. PubMed ID: 38905926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of markerless motion capture combined with computer vision techniques for measuring running kinematics.
    Van Hooren B; Pecasse N; Meijer K; Essers JMN
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2023 Jun; 33(6):966-978. PubMed ID: 36680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the accuracy of open-source pose estimation methods for measuring gait kinematics.
    Washabaugh EP; Shanmugam TA; Ranganathan R; Krishnan C
    Gait Posture; 2022 Sep; 97():188-195. PubMed ID: 35988434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted motion capture for medical applications: a comparative study between markerless and passive marker motion capture.
    Takeda I; Yamada A; Onodera H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Jun; 24(8):864-873. PubMed ID: 33290107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture.
    Kanko RM; Laende EK; Davis EM; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ
    J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110665. PubMed ID: 34380101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the reliability of single-camera markerless systems for overground gait monitoring.
    Boldo M; Di Marco R; Martini E; Nardon M; Bertucco M; Bombieri N
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 171():108101. PubMed ID: 38340440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring joint kinematics of treadmill walking and running: Comparison between an inertial sensor based system and a camera-based system.
    Nüesch C; Roos E; Pagenstert G; Mündermann A
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 57():32-38. PubMed ID: 28366438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inclusion of a skeletal model partly improves the reliability of lower limb joint angles derived from a markerless depth camera.
    Collings TJ; Devaprakash D; Pizzolato C; Lloyd DG; Barrett RS; Lenton GK; Thomeer LT; Bourne MN
    J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 170():112160. PubMed ID: 38824704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of several pose estimation methods for 3D joint centre localisation.
    Needham L; Evans M; Cosker DP; Wade L; McGuigan PM; Bilzon JL; Colyer SL
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20673. PubMed ID: 34667207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inertial Sensor-to-Segment Calibration for Accurate 3D Joint Angle Calculation for Use in OpenSim.
    Di Raimondo G; Vanwanseele B; van der Have A; Emmerzaal J; Willems M; Killen BA; Jonkers I
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35590949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions.
    Kanko RM; Outerleys JB; Laende EK; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2024 Apr; 40(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 38237574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Markerless motion capture can provide reliable 3D gait kinematics in the sagittal and frontal plane.
    Sandau M; Koblauch H; Moeslund TB; Aanæs H; Alkjær T; Simonsen EB
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1168-75. PubMed ID: 25085672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lower body kinematics estimation from wearable sensors for walking and running: A deep learning approach.
    Hernandez V; Dadkhah D; Babakeshizadeh V; Kulić D
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():185-193. PubMed ID: 33161275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-session repeatability of markerless motion capture gait kinematics.
    Kanko RM; Laende E; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ
    J Biomech; 2021 May; 121():110422. PubMed ID: 33873117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients.
    Wren TAL; Isakov P; Rethlefsen SA
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():9-14. PubMed ID: 37285635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model.
    Kainz H; Schwartz MH
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jul; 88():1-9. PubMed ID: 33933913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.