These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35408328)

  • 1. A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.
    Golabchi A; Chao A; Tavakoli M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons.
    Golabchi A; Riahi N; Fix M; Miller L; Rouhani H; Tavakoli M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104103. PubMed ID: 37499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exoskeleton Application to Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Proud JK; Lai DTH; Mudie KL; Carstairs GL; Billing DC; Garofolini A; Begg RK
    Hum Factors; 2022 May; 64(3):527-554. PubMed ID: 33203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
    Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Systematic Review on Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions.
    Kuber PM; Alemi MM; Rashedi E
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Aug; 51(8):1665-1682. PubMed ID: 37248409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling for design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: A systematic review.
    Ma T; Zhang Y; Choi SD; Xiong S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104100. PubMed ID: 37490791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
    Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces.
    Mahmud D; Bennett ST; Zhu Z; Adamczyk PG; Wehner M; Veeramani D; Dai F
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons.
    Li-Baboud YS; Virts A; Bostelman R; Yoon S; Rahman A; Rhode L; Ahmed N; Shah M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.
    Pesenti M; Antonietti A; Gandolla M; Pedrocchi A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room.
    Cha JS; Monfared S; Stefanidis D; Nussbaum MA; Yu D
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):377-390. PubMed ID: 31593495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review.
    Zheng L; Lowe B; Hawke AL; Wu JZ
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2021; 49(4):1-13. PubMed ID: 35695600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends.
    Kuber PM; Abdollahi M; Alemi MM; Rashedi E
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Oct; 50(10):1203-1231. PubMed ID: 35916980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of exoskeletons in the occupational context for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal complaints.
    Steinhilber B; Luger T; Schwenkreis P; Middeldorf S; Bork H; Mann B; von Glinski A; Schildhauer TA; Weiler S; Schmauder M; Heinrich K; Winter G; Schnalke G; Frener P; Schick R; Wischniewski S; Jäger M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(3):132-144. PubMed ID: 33140996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review.
    Kermavnar T; de Vries AW; de Looze MP; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jun; 64(6):685-711. PubMed ID: 33369518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits.
    Ali A; Fontanari V; Schmoelz W; Agrawal SK
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():765257. PubMed ID: 34805118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking occupational exoskeletons: An evidence mapping systematic review.
    De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Govaerts R; Tassignon B; Rodriguez-Guerrero C; Crea S; Veneman J; Geeroms J; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Jan; 98():103582. PubMed ID: 34600307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry.
    Okunola A; Afolabi A; Akanmu A; Jebelli H; Simikins S
    J Safety Res; 2024 Sep; 90():402-415. PubMed ID: 39251296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of passive exoskeleton support on EMG measures of the neck, shoulder and trunk muscles while holding simulated surgical postures and performing a simulated surgical procedure.
    Tetteh E; Hallbeck MS; Mirka GA
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103646. PubMed ID: 34847371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.